Difference between revisions of "2017 Winter Project Week/LORDWI"
From NAMIC Wiki
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
* Figure out anyone is in need of DWI registration for testing, have a dataset already registered (for comparison), or can help with anatomical landmarks. | * Figure out anyone is in need of DWI registration for testing, have a dataset already registered (for comparison), or can help with anatomical landmarks. | ||
* Consider if Slicer can be used in tandem for evaluation. | * Consider if Slicer can be used in tandem for evaluation. | ||
− | |||
| | | | ||
<!-- Progress and Next steps bullet points (fill out at the end of project week) --> | <!-- Progress and Next steps bullet points (fill out at the end of project week) --> | ||
− | * | + | The goal was too lofty but the product was good. |
+ | * Had a lot of great discussions and great discussions. | ||
+ | * Got working on acquiring data from different sources (more problems are always welcome!) | ||
+ | * Shared some experiences. | ||
+ | * Got a nice introduction to Slicer. | ||
+ | |||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 03:39, 13 January 2017
Home < 2017 Winter Project Week < LORDWIKey Investigators
- Henrik Groenholt Jensen, UCPH
- Lauren J. O'Donnell, BWH
- Tina Kapur, BWH
- Fan Zhang, BWH
- Carl-Fredrik Westin, BWH
Project Description
Objective | Approach and Plan | Progress and Next Steps |
---|---|---|
|
|
The goal was too lofty but the product was good.
|
Background and References
- MICCAI paper on early framework: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-24571-3_37