Difference between revisions of "2009 Winter Project Week fMRI Clustering"
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
===References=== | ===References=== | ||
| − | * | + | *A. Venkataraman et. al. "Exploring Functional Connectivity in fMRI via Clustering." Submitted to ICASSP 2009. |
| − | * | + | *M.D.Fox and M.E.Raichle, "Spontaneous Fluctuations in Brain Activity Observed with Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging." Nature, vol.8, pp.700-711, 2007. |
| − | * | + | *B.Biswat et. al. "Functional Connectivity in the Motor Cortex of Resting Human Brain using Echo-Planar MRI." MRM, vol.34, pp.537-541, 1995. |
| + | *C.Fowlkes et. al. "Spectral Grouping Using the Nystrom Method." IEEE PAMI, vol.26, pp.214-225, 2004. | ||
| + | *P.Golland et. al. "Detection of Spatial Activation Patterns as Unsupervised Segmentation of fMRI Data." MICCAI, pp.110-118, 2007. | ||
Revision as of 20:11, 8 December 2008
Home < 2009 Winter Project Week fMRI Clustering Return to Project Week Main Page |
Key Investigators
- MIT: Archana Venkataraman
- BWH: Marek Kubicki
- MIT: Polina Golland
Objective
We are developing methods to characterize differences between healthy subjects and patients with Schizophrenia. Our work uses resting state fMRI data to pinpoint brain regions with "similar" voxel time courses. Resting state data is thought to capture spontaneous, low-frequency oscillations in the brain, and it is commonly used for functional connectivity analysis. The goal of this work is to pinpoint brain structures which are indicative of each population (healthy vs. Schizophrenic).
Approach, Plan
Our approach is to use clustering methods to partition the whole brain into functionally coherent regions. Currently, the most common approach for functional connectivity analysis is seed-based correlation analysis. This method requires the user to identify a "seed" region of interest and identifies voxels significantly correlated with the mean time course of this ROI. In contrast, clustering algorithms are entirely data-driven and do not require any prior information about the brain's spatial or functional organization.
We consider two different clustering algorithms: K-Means clustering and Spectral Clustering. To enable clustering of the entire brain volume, we use the Nystrom Method to approximate the necessary spectral decompositions.
Our plan for project week is to start pre-processing the new dataset of healthy subjects and schizophrenia patients using FSL. This includes standard fMRI preprocessing as well as additional preprocessing for functional connectivity analysis. If time permits, we would like to obtain preliminary clustering results and understand the strengths/limitations of the above clustering methods.
Progress
It has previously been shown that both K-Means clustering and Spectral Clustering produce reasonable partitions across subjects (A. Venkataraman et. al). However, the study was carried out on a dataset of 45 healthy young adults. The results have not been tested/compared across different populations.
References
- A. Venkataraman et. al. "Exploring Functional Connectivity in fMRI via Clustering." Submitted to ICASSP 2009.
- M.D.Fox and M.E.Raichle, "Spontaneous Fluctuations in Brain Activity Observed with Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging." Nature, vol.8, pp.700-711, 2007.
- B.Biswat et. al. "Functional Connectivity in the Motor Cortex of Resting Human Brain using Echo-Planar MRI." MRM, vol.34, pp.537-541, 1995.
- C.Fowlkes et. al. "Spectral Grouping Using the Nystrom Method." IEEE PAMI, vol.26, pp.214-225, 2004.
- P.Golland et. al. "Detection of Spatial Activation Patterns as Unsupervised Segmentation of fMRI Data." MICCAI, pp.110-118, 2007.
