Difference between revisions of "2009 Summer Project Week Prostate Robotics"

From NAMIC Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
 
<gallery>
 
<gallery>
 +
Image:PW2009-v3.png|[[2009_Summer_Project_Week|Project Week Main Page]]
 
Image:SummerProjectWeek2009_BRPRobot.jpg|MRI-compatible pneumatic manipulator for needle placement
 
Image:SummerProjectWeek2009_BRPRobot.jpg|MRI-compatible pneumatic manipulator for needle placement
 
Image:SummerProjectWeek2009_ZFrameScreenshot.png|Confirmation screen for Z-frame robot-to-image registration on 3D Slicer.
 
Image:SummerProjectWeek2009_ZFrameScreenshot.png|Confirmation screen for Z-frame robot-to-image registration on 3D Slicer.

Revision as of 15:41, 22 May 2009

Home < 2009 Summer Project Week Prostate Robotics

Key Investigators

  • BWH: Junichi Tokuda, Nobuhiko Hata
  • JHU: Sam Song, Nathan Cho
  • AMS: Jack Blevins, Clif Burdette
  • WPI: Gregory Fischer
  • Queen's: Andras Lasso

Objective

We will perform a mock-up procedure to validate our software / hardware system for MRI-guided transperineal prostate intervention.


Approach, Plan

The software system consists of three sub-components: a) control software for the needle placement robot, b) software to control a closed-bore whole body 3T MRI scanner (GE Excite HD 3T, GE Healthcare), and c) open-source surgical navigation software (3D Slicer, http://www.slicer.org/). The core component of the software system is 3D Slicer, running on a Linux-based workstation, that serves as an integrated environment for calibration, surgical planning, image guidance and device monitoring and control. The 3D Slicer communicates with the other components through 100 Base-T Ethernet to exchange data and commands using an open network communication protocol, OpenIGTLink. We developed a software module in 3D Slicer that offers all features uniquely required for MR-guided robotic prostate intervention, as follows: 1) management of the ‘workphase’ of the all components in the system; 2) treatment planning by placing target points on the pre-operative 3D images loaded on the 3D Slicer and robot control based on the plan; 3) registration of the robot and patient coordinate systems; 4) integrated visualization of real-time 2D image, preoperative 3D image, and visualization of the current needle position on the 3D viewer of 3D Slicer.

Progress

During IGT Workshop in 2008 (Boston, December 2008), we successfully tested communication among the navigation software (3D Slicer / RadVision), robot control software, and 3T MRI at BWH. Since then, we have been working on two tasks: improvement of the pneumatic mechanism at JHU and volunteer studies to analyze the workspace in the 3T MRI at BWH.

References