Difference between revisions of "Collaboration:MR Wiki"
From NAMIC Wiki
(Created page with '=Tcon 08-28-2009= Attending: David, David, Ron # Ron should have a tcon next week with Roberta and Sally to discuss the technical issues around the creation of a wiki server and …') |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Tcon 08-28-2009= | =Tcon 08-28-2009= | ||
Attending: David, David, Ron | Attending: David, David, Ron | ||
| − | # Ron should have a tcon next week with Roberta and Sally to discuss | + | # Ron should have a tcon next week with Roberta and Sally to discuss the technical issues around the creation of a wiki server and the software |
| − | the technical issues around the creation of a wiki server and the software | + | to be used. It would probably be sensible to ask Peter Seres to participate in that as well. |
| − | to be used. It would probably be sensible to ask Peter Seres to participate | + | # Ron would use this information to develop with the Central Office an action plan for the development and implementation of an MR wikipedia - including some of the options (and an idea of related resource and costs) he suggested for future expansion - a publication database and more complex media display - - based on his experience with his slicer development (Ron will send some links on this)./ |
| − | in that as well. | + | # The issues of governance probably to be addressed by an editorial board - engaging members with responsibility for particular areas - this could be put together with help from the publications cttee - and also by direct invitation to the membership themselves. Controversy is to be expected, anticipated and planned for. |
| − | # Ron would use this information to develop with the Central Office an | + | # There is a good case for making the wiki open to the public early on - and Ron will make these points in the Action Plan as the Board and Exec |
| − | action plan for the development and implementation of an MR wikipedia - | + | will no doubt want to understand these issues before applying the brand name. |
| − | including some of the options (and an idea of related resource and costs) he | + | # The action plan could be circulated past the web services committee in the next few weeks for comments and suggestions and then we could |
| − | suggested for future expansion - a publication database and more complex | ||
| − | media display - - based on his experience with his slicer development (Ron | ||
| − | will send some links on this)./ | ||
| − | # The issues of governance probably to be addressed by an editorial | ||
| − | board - engaging members with responsibility for particular areas - this | ||
| − | could be put together with help from the publications cttee - and also by | ||
| − | direct invitation to the membership themselves. Controversy is to be | ||
| − | expected, anticipated and planned for. | ||
| − | # There is a good case for making the wiki open to the public early on | ||
| − | - and Ron will make these points in the Action Plan as the Board and Exec | ||
| − | will no doubt want to understand these issues before applying the | ||
| − | brand name. | ||
| − | # The action plan could be circulated past the web services committee | ||
| − | in the next few weeks for comments and suggestions and then we could | ||
hopefully start to implement something. | hopefully start to implement something. | ||
Revision as of 14:24, 29 August 2009
Home < Collaboration:MR WikiTcon 08-28-2009
Attending: David, David, Ron
- Ron should have a tcon next week with Roberta and Sally to discuss the technical issues around the creation of a wiki server and the software
to be used. It would probably be sensible to ask Peter Seres to participate in that as well.
- Ron would use this information to develop with the Central Office an action plan for the development and implementation of an MR wikipedia - including some of the options (and an idea of related resource and costs) he suggested for future expansion - a publication database and more complex media display - - based on his experience with his slicer development (Ron will send some links on this)./
- The issues of governance probably to be addressed by an editorial board - engaging members with responsibility for particular areas - this could be put together with help from the publications cttee - and also by direct invitation to the membership themselves. Controversy is to be expected, anticipated and planned for.
- There is a good case for making the wiki open to the public early on - and Ron will make these points in the Action Plan as the Board and Exec
will no doubt want to understand these issues before applying the brand name.
- The action plan could be circulated past the web services committee in the next few weeks for comments and suggestions and then we could
hopefully start to implement something.
