Difference between revisions of "Sept-2009-SlicerWidgetsBrainstorm"

From NAMIC Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 29: Line 29:
 
** http://gwt.google.com/samples/Mail/Mail.html
 
** http://gwt.google.com/samples/Mail/Mail.html
 
** http://earth-api-samples.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/demos/drive-simulator/index.html
 
** http://earth-api-samples.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/demos/drive-simulator/index.html
* http://pyjs.org/examples/
+
* http://pyjs.org
 +
** http://pyjs.org/examples/
 +
** http://pyjs.org/examples/mail/output/Mail.html

Revision as of 18:30, 31 August 2009

Home < Sept-2009-SlicerWidgetsBrainstorm
  • Location: 1249 Boylston Street
  • Attendance (People actively involved in Slicer GUI development and use are encouraged to attend and contribute):
  1. Will Schroeder
  2. Steve Pieper
  3. Ron Kikinis

Goals

The purpose of this meeting is to discuss development strategies to migrate Slicer to a new GUI layer. For some background see here.

Important questions to consider at this meeting are:

  • What functionality does the application need to have in order to accomplish the needs of our DBP and clinical collaborations over the next several years?
  • What look and feel should the application have?
  • What capabilities will help us build the community of developers and users
    • Standard tools - well supported with ample documentation, support, etc
    • Flexibility to run in many environments
    • Ease of use and productivity for developers
  • Can we get a realistic estimate of the workload required and what skills are required to do the work?
    • How much work have comparable project required (by people with what skills and experience?)
    • What resources do we have to devote to this project compared with other demands?
  • Are we comfortable that we have considered all the viable alternatives?
    • What are the trends in GUI interface development for applications like ours
    • What are the risks/benefits/complexity trade offs of various approaches

Things to Consider