Difference between revisions of "Projects:ARRA:SlicerWF:UseCaseScenarios"
From NAMIC Wiki
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
** Data loaded into Slicer for interactive editing of label maps as QC | ** Data loaded into Slicer for interactive editing of label maps as QC | ||
** Results loaded back into XNAT | ** Results loaded back into XNAT | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | * see also [[2009_Summer_Project_Week_Slicer3_XNAT_usecases#Use_Case_3:_Quality_Control_Processing_of_Large_Studies| Hans Johnsons scenario]] for similarities. | ||
Revision as of 20:07, 20 October 2009
Home < Projects:ARRA:SlicerWF:UseCaseScenariosBack to SPINE ARRA page
- Oct-20-2009
- Meeting with Charles and Alex. Discussed following use-case scenario:
- Data lives in XNAT
- Black box processing pipeline applied to data
- Results back to XNAT after QC for completeness
- MRML file gets autogenerated
- Data loaded into Slicer for interactive editing of label maps as QC
- Results loaded back into XNAT
- see also Hans Johnsons scenario for similarities.
