Difference between revisions of "Projects:ARRA:SlicerWF:UseCaseScenarios"
From NAMIC Wiki
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
** Data loaded into Slicer for interactive editing of label maps as QC | ** Data loaded into Slicer for interactive editing of label maps as QC | ||
** Results loaded back into XNAT | ** Results loaded back into XNAT | ||
− | |||
− | |||
=Use-case MS lesion QC= | =Use-case MS lesion QC= | ||
# Workflow "blackbox" generates lesion maps along with lesion coordinates files | # Workflow "blackbox" generates lesion maps along with lesion coordinates files | ||
# Human Interaction module loads image volumes into Slicer with fiduciary markers for lesion assessment | # Human Interaction module loads image volumes into Slicer with fiduciary markers for lesion assessment | ||
+ | =Use-case COPD= | ||
− | = | + | =External use-cases= |
+ | * see also [[2009_Summer_Project_Week_Slicer3_XNAT_usecases#Use_Case_3:_Quality_Control_Processing_of_Large_Studies| Hans Johnsons scenario]] for similarities. |
Revision as of 21:01, 20 October 2009
Home < Projects:ARRA:SlicerWF:UseCaseScenariosBack to SPINE ARRA page
Overview
- Oct-20-2009
- Meeting with Charles and Alex. Discussed following use-case scenario:
- Data lives in XNAT
- Black box processing pipeline applied to data
- Results back to XNAT after QC for completeness
- MRML file gets autogenerated
- Data loaded into Slicer for interactive editing of label maps as QC
- Results loaded back into XNAT
Use-case MS lesion QC
- Workflow "blackbox" generates lesion maps along with lesion coordinates files
- Human Interaction module loads image volumes into Slicer with fiduciary markers for lesion assessment
Use-case COPD
External use-cases
- see also Hans Johnsons scenario for similarities.