Difference between revisions of "EM Segmentation For Orthopaedic Applications"

From NAMIC Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 12: Line 12:
 
**Validation assessed using the laser scanning of the index finger (proximal, middle, and distal) phalanx bones in five specimens
 
**Validation assessed using the laser scanning of the index finger (proximal, middle, and distal) phalanx bones in five specimens
 
* Work is underway to develop a Slicer2.7 tutorial for this segmentation ([[Image:Draft_EM_Segment_Tutorial_9_12.pdf|Draft Copy]])
 
* Work is underway to develop a Slicer2.7 tutorial for this segmentation ([[Image:Draft_EM_Segment_Tutorial_9_12.pdf|Draft Copy]])
 +
 +
'''Results:'''
 +
 +
{| class="wikitable" border="1" cellpadding="2"
 +
|+Relative Overlap with Manual Rater
 +
|-
 +
! Finger !! Phalanx Segment !! Average Relative Overlap
 +
|-
 +
! Index (14 subjects)
 +
| Proximal || 0.87
 +
|-
 +
!
 +
| Medial || 0.80
 +
|-
 +
!
 +
| Distal || 0.70
 +
|-
 +
! Middle (2 subjects)
 +
| Proximal || 0.79
 +
|-
 +
!
 +
| Medial || 0.77
 +
|-
 +
!
 +
| Distal || 0.71
 +
|-
 +
! Ring (2 subjects)
 +
| Proximal || 0.76
 +
|-
 +
!
 +
| Medial || 0.82
 +
|-
 +
!
 +
| Distal || 0.80
 +
|-
 +
! Pinky (2 subjects)
 +
| Proximal || 0.70
 +
|-
 +
!
 +
| Medial || 0.73
 +
|-
 +
!
 +
| Distal || 0.72
 +
|}
 +
 +
* Example of Validation Results is shown below in the figures
 +
 +
 +
 +
  
 
'''To Do:'''
 
'''To Do:'''
−
* Evaluate the Slicer3 EM Segmentation Module
+
*Update the the tutorial to support the Slicer3 Workflow
−
* Update the the tutorial to support the Slicer3 Workflow
+
**Tutorial will be developed by Austin Ramme - In progress
−
* Determine if registration tools in Slicer are adequate for this work.
+
*Slicer3 Segmentation applied to the femur
 +
**Using BRAINSFit for mapping of probability information to the subject images
 +
 
 +
'''Manuscript:'''
 +
*Ramme AJ, Devries N, Kallemyn NA, Magnotta VA, Grosland NM. [http://www.springerlink.com/content/h972u63630311g78/ Semi-automated Phalanx Bone Segmentation Using the Expectation Maximization Algorithm]. J Digit Imaging. 2008.
 +
 
  
 
'''Key Investigators:'''
 
'''Key Investigators:'''
Line 30: Line 85:
 
[[Image:EM-Segment-Phalanx.png|left|thumb|300px|Surface models from EM Segmentation generated via Slicer3]]
 
[[Image:EM-Segment-Phalanx.png|left|thumb|300px|Surface models from EM Segmentation generated via Slicer3]]
  
−
[[Image:EM-Segment-Proximal.png|left|thumb|300px|Results of the EM Segmentation for the Proximal Pahalanx]]
+
[[Image:EM-Segment-Proximal.png|left|thumb|450px|Results of the EM Segmentation for the Proximal Pahalanx]]
 +
 
 +
[[Image:EMSegment-Phalanx-DistanceMap.jpg|left|thumb|300px|Validation of EM Segmentation for the phalanx bones of the hand. Distance of automated segmentation versus physical laser surface scanning]]

Latest revision as of 18:30, 20 January 2010

Home < EM Segmentation For Orthopaedic Applications

Objective:

  • To utilize the Slicer3 Expectation Maximization Algorithm for segmentation of the phalanx bones of the hand.

Progress:

  • We have utilized the Slicer2.7 EM Segmentation Module for segmentation of the phalanx bones
    1. Registration was performed outside of Slicer using ITK registration algorithms that are available in the IaFeMesh software. This includes Thin plate spline, B-Spline and rigid registration algorithms.
    2. Probability map information was created from a single subject used as the atlas image and filtered using a Gaussian filter.
  • Initial evaluation has been performed
    • Reliability assessed on fourteen specimens that also had the index finger segmented, and two specimens that had the index, middle, ring and little fingers manually segmented
    • Validation assessed using the laser scanning of the index finger (proximal, middle, and distal) phalanx bones in five specimens
  • Work is underway to develop a Slicer2.7 tutorial for this segmentation (File:Draft EM Segment Tutorial 9 12.pdf)

Results:

Relative Overlap with Manual Rater
Finger Phalanx Segment Average Relative Overlap
Index (14 subjects) Proximal 0.87
Medial 0.80
Distal 0.70
Middle (2 subjects) Proximal 0.79
Medial 0.77
Distal 0.71
Ring (2 subjects) Proximal 0.76
Medial 0.82
Distal 0.80
Pinky (2 subjects) Proximal 0.70
Medial 0.73
Distal 0.72
  • Example of Validation Results is shown below in the figures



To Do:

  • Update the the tutorial to support the Slicer3 Workflow
    • Tutorial will be developed by Austin Ramme - In progress
  • Slicer3 Segmentation applied to the femur
    • Using BRAINSFit for mapping of probability information to the subject images

Manuscript:


Key Investigators:

  • Iowa: Austin Ramme, Nicole Grosland, and Vincent Magnotta

Links:


Figures:

Surface models from EM Segmentation generated via Slicer3
Results of the EM Segmentation for the Proximal Pahalanx
Validation of EM Segmentation for the phalanx bones of the hand. Distance of automated segmentation versus physical laser surface scanning
Retrieved from "https://www.na-mic.org/w/index.php?title=EM_Segmentation_For_Orthopaedic_Applications&oldid=47921"