Difference between revisions of "Seedings results comparison"
From NAMIC Wiki
Arnaudgelas (talk | contribs) |
Arnaudgelas (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
<h3>Progress</h3> | <h3>Progress</h3> | ||
− | * Implemented 3 different | + | * Implemented 3 different algorithms with ITK: |
** Tensor voting, | ** Tensor voting, | ||
** Hough transform, | ** Hough transform, | ||
− | ** | + | ** Multi-scale Distance Map weighted Laplacian of Gaussian. |
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div style="width: 97%; float: left;"> | <div style="width: 97%; float: left;"> |
Revision as of 22:14, 8 June 2010
Home < Seedings results comparisonKey Investigators
- Harvard Medical School: Antonin Perrot-Audet, Kishore Mosaliganti, Sean Megason
- RPI: Badri Roysam
Project
Objective
- Improve segmentation algorithms initialization for nuclei detection in 3D fluorescent microscopy:
- get a better accuracy,
- improve computation speed.
Approach, Plan
- Compare different algorithms,
- Find a measure to evaluate different algorithm results,
- Fusion output of several algorithms.
Progress
- Implemented 3 different algorithms with ITK:
- Tensor voting,
- Hough transform,
- Multi-scale Distance Map weighted Laplacian of Gaussian.