Difference between revisions of "2010 Summer Project Week RegistrationEvaluation"
Jfishbaugh (talk | contribs) |
Jfishbaugh (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
<h3>Approach, Plan</h3> | <h3>Approach, Plan</h3> | ||
+ | |||
+ | We propose evaluating registration in Slicer by focusing on three experiments: | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Synthetic Example''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Multi-modal Registration From Traumatic Brain Injury Study''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Registration of Atrial Fibrillation Pre and Post Treatment''' | ||
</div> | </div> |
Revision as of 21:22, 9 June 2010
Home < 2010 Summer Project Week RegistrationEvaluationKey Investigators
- University of Utah: James Fishbaugh, Guido Gerig
- BWH: Dominik Meier
Objective
Recently, effort has been made in improving registration in Slicer. This includes the development and improvement of the RegisterImages module along with corresponding documentation from the use case library . The work on RegisterImages aimed at making registration easier, faster, and more accurate, while the use case library acts as a starting point and tutorial for users with a particular type of registration problem.
In order to continue improving registration, we propose a project to evaluate the current state of non-linear registration in Slicer. The results from this study will likely highlight areas of both strength and weakness in registration currently available in Slicer.
Approach, Plan
We propose evaluating registration in Slicer by focusing on three experiments:
Synthetic Example
Multi-modal Registration From Traumatic Brain Injury Study
Registration of Atrial Fibrillation Pre and Post Treatment