Difference between revisions of "2011 Summer Project Week Breakout Session EMRegistration"
From NAMIC Wiki
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
===Meeting Notes:=== | ===Meeting Notes:=== | ||
| + | *Hans pointed out that an upcoming fix, soon to be in ITK4, will incorporate an improved placement of control points, which reduces the need for masking | ||
| + | *CMTK takes ~1hr and is not a BSD license | ||
| + | *skull stripped input is not necessarily avail. for all input | ||
Revision as of 19:46, 22 June 2011
Home < 2011 Summer Project Week Breakout Session EMRegistrationContents
Summer Project Week Breakout Session: Registration for EM Segmenter
Wednesday, June 22, 2011, 3-4pm, Star room.
Synopsis:
The EM segmenter includes as a vital step the co-registration of a multiple subject atlas to obtain spatial priors for small region detection. The success of these priors depends heavily on the quality of the registration obtained. Because the registration includes a large-DOF nonrigid inter-subject registration, benchmarks for a good solution are largely absent. We seek an implementation of a registration using Slicer registration tools that will provide best possible robustness and if possible an estimate of reliability. Because this registration will be integrated into a slicer module, tools with a BSD license are strongly preferred.
Attendees (tentative):
- Kilian Pohl
- Dominik Meier
- Dominique Belhachemi
- Stephen Aylward
- Hans Johnson
- Bill Lorensen
- Jim Miller
- Allen Tannenbaum
- Daniel Haehn
Reference Material:
Preliminary Agenda:
- Description of the registration task for the EM segmenter
- Review of example case
- Comparison of BRAINSfit and CMTK strategies
- Discussion of design/implementation options/strategies
Meeting Notes:
- Hans pointed out that an upcoming fix, soon to be in ITK4, will incorporate an improved placement of control points, which reduces the need for masking
- CMTK takes ~1hr and is not a BSD license
- skull stripped input is not necessarily avail. for all input
