Difference between revisions of "2014 Project Week:QA module"
From NAMIC Wiki
(Created page with '__NOTOC__ <gallery> Image:PW-SLC2014.png|Projects List </gallery> ==Key Investigators== ==Project Description== <div style="margin: 20px;…') |
|||
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<gallery> | <gallery> | ||
Image:PW-SLC2014.png|[[2014_Winter_Project_Week#Projects|Projects List]] | Image:PW-SLC2014.png|[[2014_Winter_Project_Week#Projects|Projects List]] | ||
| + | Image:QAModule_filtered.png | ||
| + | Image:QAModuleCloseup.png | ||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
==Key Investigators== | ==Key Investigators== | ||
| + | * Iowa: Dave Welch, Hans Johnson | ||
==Project Description== | ==Project Description== | ||
| − | + | <div style="width: 100%;"> | |
<div style="margin: 20px;"> | <div style="margin: 20px;"> | ||
<div style="width: 27%; float: left; padding-right: 3%;"> | <div style="width: 27%; float: left; padding-right: 3%;"> | ||
<h3>Objective</h3> | <h3>Objective</h3> | ||
| − | * | + | * We have an automatic QA application that compares old experiment results with manual QA measures to new experiment results. For some comparisons, the automated QA application cannot determine the quality and needs manual intervention. The SlicerQA module <ref>[https://github.com/BRAINSia/SlicerQAExtension.git QA module on Github]</ref> needs to be updated s.t. only the undetermined images/regions are evaluated manually by our QA raters. |
</div> | </div> | ||
<div style="width: 27%; float: left; padding-right: 3%;"> | <div style="width: 27%; float: left; padding-right: 3%;"> | ||
<h3>Approach, Plan</h3> | <h3>Approach, Plan</h3> | ||
| − | * | + | * Update helper.py with new PostgreSQL commands |
| + | * Disable region/image buttons that have automated reviews | ||
| + | * Force QA comments on failing regions | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div style="width: 27%; float: left; padding-right: 3%;"> | <div style="width: 27%; float: left; padding-right: 3%;"> | ||
<h3>Progress</h3> | <h3>Progress</h3> | ||
| − | * | + | * [COMPLETE] |
</div> | </div> | ||
| + | </div> | ||
| + | </div> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==References== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <div style="float: left; padding-right: 3%;"> | ||
| + | <h3>Source Code</h3> | ||
| + | <references/> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Latest revision as of 17:25, 10 January 2014
Home < 2014 Project Week:QA module
Key Investigators
- Iowa: Dave Welch, Hans Johnson
Project Description
Objective
- We have an automatic QA application that compares old experiment results with manual QA measures to new experiment results. For some comparisons, the automated QA application cannot determine the quality and needs manual intervention. The SlicerQA module [1] needs to be updated s.t. only the undetermined images/regions are evaluated manually by our QA raters.
Approach, Plan
- Update helper.py with new PostgreSQL commands
- Disable region/image buttons that have automated reviews
- Force QA comments on failing regions
Progress
- [COMPLETE]
