Difference between revisions of "2014 Summer Project Week:ManualSegmentationQA"
From NAMIC Wiki
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<gallery> | <gallery> | ||
Image:PW-MIT2014.png|[[2014_Summer_Project_Week#Projects|Projects List]] | Image:PW-MIT2014.png|[[2014_Summer_Project_Week#Projects|Projects List]] | ||
+ | Image:ManualSegmentationQAmodule.png| GUI | ||
+ | Image:ManSeg2.png| In action | ||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
Line 30: | Line 32: | ||
* Complete | * Complete | ||
* TODO: reviewers have requested hotkeys similar to Slicer 3 for Editor which we haven't implemented yet | * TODO: reviewers have requested hotkeys similar to Slicer 3 for Editor which we haven't implemented yet | ||
+ | * TODO: Integrate with Subject Hierarchy module | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> |
Latest revision as of 14:11, 27 June 2014
Home < 2014 Summer Project Week:ManualSegmentationQAKey Investigators
- IOWA: Dave Welch, Hans Johnson
Project Description
Objective
- Create a Slicer module/extension to connect to a segmentation database and que 'bad' segmentations for QA raters review and editing
Approach, Plan
- Identify bad segmentations from PostgreSQL database of QA reviews
- Load corresponding label map, T1, and T2 (if available)
- Color label map s.t. 'good' labels are in green and bad labels in high-contrast colors
- Include Editor widgets within module for label manipulation
- Give users ability to:
- leave bad regions unchanged with confirmation
- edit good regions if desired
- leave notes in database
- toggle specific regions on/off in scene
Progress
- Complete
- TODO: reviewers have requested hotkeys similar to Slicer 3 for Editor which we haven't implemented yet
- TODO: Integrate with Subject Hierarchy module