Difference between revisions of "2014 Summer Project Week:ManualSegmentationQA"

From NAMIC Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
Image:PW-MIT2014.png|[[2014_Summer_Project_Week#Projects|Projects List]]
 
Image:PW-MIT2014.png|[[2014_Summer_Project_Week#Projects|Projects List]]
 
Image:ManualSegmentationQAmodule.png| GUI
 
Image:ManualSegmentationQAmodule.png| GUI
 +
Image:ManSeg2.png| In action
 
</gallery>
 
</gallery>
  
Line 31: Line 32:
 
* Complete
 
* Complete
 
* TODO: reviewers have requested hotkeys similar to Slicer 3 for Editor which we haven't implemented yet
 
* TODO: reviewers have requested hotkeys similar to Slicer 3 for Editor which we haven't implemented yet
 +
* TODO: Integrate with Subject Hierarchy module
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>

Latest revision as of 14:11, 27 June 2014

Home < 2014 Summer Project Week:ManualSegmentationQA

Key Investigators

  • IOWA: Dave Welch, Hans Johnson

Project Description

Objective

  • Create a Slicer module/extension to connect to a segmentation database and que 'bad' segmentations for QA raters review and editing

Approach, Plan

  • Identify bad segmentations from PostgreSQL database of QA reviews
  • Load corresponding label map, T1, and T2 (if available)
  • Color label map s.t. 'good' labels are in green and bad labels in high-contrast colors
  • Include Editor widgets within module for label manipulation
  • Give users ability to:
    • leave bad regions unchanged with confirmation
    • edit good regions if desired
    • leave notes in database
    • toggle specific regions on/off in scene

Progress

  • Complete
  • TODO: reviewers have requested hotkeys similar to Slicer 3 for Editor which we haven't implemented yet
  • TODO: Integrate with Subject Hierarchy module