Difference between revisions of "2015 Winter Project Week:SlicerMicroMacroScale"
From NAMIC Wiki
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
<h3>Progress</h3> | <h3>Progress</h3> | ||
* Investigating the base scaling assumptions for vtkSeedWidgets in 3d ctkVTKRenderView vs 2d ctkVTKSliceView | * Investigating the base scaling assumptions for vtkSeedWidgets in 3d ctkVTKRenderView vs 2d ctkVTKSliceView | ||
| − | ** writing a pure CTK test case | + | ** writing a pure CTK test case - it shows that in the default set up for the two kinds of views and mirrored seed widgets the seeds are the same size (large) |
| + | ** in Slicer, the camera in the 2d view is looking at the 2d scene from a camera distance of 1.0 while the default 3D distance is 600.0 | ||
| + | ** in the pure CTK test case, resetting the 3D camera to a position (0,0,600) the same issues can be seen as are visible in Slicer (tiny seed in 3D, large in 2D) | ||
| + | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 22:55, 7 January 2015
Home < 2015 Winter Project Week:SlicerMicroMacroScale
Key Investigators
- Nicole Aucoin (BWH)
- Bradley Lowenkamp (Medical Science Computing)
Project Description
Objective
- Fix bugs exposed by using small and large scale images
Approach, Plan
- List of related bugs:
- Sample data sets
Progress
- Investigating the base scaling assumptions for vtkSeedWidgets in 3d ctkVTKRenderView vs 2d ctkVTKSliceView
- writing a pure CTK test case - it shows that in the default set up for the two kinds of views and mirrored seed widgets the seeds are the same size (large)
- in Slicer, the camera in the 2d view is looking at the 2d scene from a camera distance of 1.0 while the default 3D distance is 600.0
- in the pure CTK test case, resetting the 3D camera to a position (0,0,600) the same issues can be seen as are visible in Slicer (tiny seed in 3D, large in 2D)
