Difference between revisions of "2015 Summer Project Week:Dicom parsing with DCMJS"

From NAMIC Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 25: Line 25:
 
<div style="width: 27%; float: left; padding-right: 3%;">
 
<div style="width: 27%; float: left; padding-right: 3%;">
 
<h3>Progress</h3>
 
<h3>Progress</h3>
−
* Evaluated speed of current solutions
+
* Evaluation of current solutions
−
** dcmjs slower (150ms for dcmdump vs 30ms for other solutions)
+
** yves:
−
** compilation of  dcmjs with -o3 or -of drasticly improves performance of dcmjs
+
*** pros: fast
−
* Limitations of current solutions
+
*** cons: single frame and need to parse dicom header by hand in JS later on
−
** single frame dicom images
+
** dicomparser: same
−
** hard to re-use
+
** dcmjs:
−
** hard to extend
+
*** pro: relies on dcmtk, (almost) no need to manually parse dicom header by hand
 +
*** cons: slower (150ms for dcmdump vs 30ms for other solutions)
 +
** note: compilation of  dcmjs with -o3 or -of drasticly improves performance of dcmjs
 
* Proposed workflow
 
* Proposed workflow
 
** https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1BX0NBIDPrrM-JGk9b1awL_w57f9rMvdTJSeVjT9bM5U
 
** https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1BX0NBIDPrrM-JGk9b1awL_w57f9rMvdTJSeVjT9bM5U

Revision as of 07:56, 24 June 2015

Home < 2015 Summer Project Week:Dicom parsing with DCMJS

Key Investigators

  • Nicolas Rannou
  • Michael Onken
  • Steve Pieper

Project Description

Objective

  • Define target DICOM types
  • Define a good workflow to parse targets with DCMJS.
  • Define required JS models to support the workflow.
  • Evaluate DicomParser from cornerstone team.

Approach, Plan

  • Talk with DICOM/DCMTK experts to get some feedback on best strategy.
  • Write a demo to showcase js models and dicom parsing workflows.

Progress

  • Evaluation of current solutions
    • yves:
      • pros: fast
      • cons: single frame and need to parse dicom header by hand in JS later on
    • dicomparser: same
    • dcmjs:
      • pro: relies on dcmtk, (almost) no need to manually parse dicom header by hand
      • cons: slower (150ms for dcmdump vs 30ms for other solutions)
    • note: compilation of dcmjs with -o3 or -of drasticly improves performance of dcmjs
  • Proposed workflow
  • Take dicom segmentations/models into account
  • Testing database
Retrieved from "https://www.na-mic.org/w/index.php?title=2015_Summer_Project_Week:Dicom_parsing_with_DCMJS&oldid=89868"