Difference between revisions of "2016 Winter Project Week/Projects/Workflows"
From NAMIC Wiki
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
==Key Investigators== | ==Key Investigators== | ||
* Raúl San José | * Raúl San José | ||
− | * Jorge Onieva | + | * Jorge Onieva |
+ | * Hans Meine (interested observer) | ||
==Project Description== | ==Project Description== | ||
Line 26: | Line 27: | ||
| | | | ||
<!-- Fill this out at the end of Project Week; describe what you did this week and what you plan to do next --> | <!-- Fill this out at the end of Project Week; describe what you did this week and what you plan to do next --> | ||
− | * | + | *Slicelets and total customization of the Slicer UI seem to be a good approach to implement workflows (from a GUI point of view). It looks too hard to generalize a GUI for every workflow ("CLI style") |
+ | * One of the best options for Python modules seems to be extending the ScriptedLoadableModule classes, adding input/output parameters and a "run" method, following a similar architecture than CLIs | ||
|} | |} |
Latest revision as of 14:57, 8 January 2016
Home < 2016 Winter Project Week < Projects < WorkflowsKey Investigators
- Raúl San José
- Jorge Onieva
- Hans Meine (interested observer)
Project Description
Objective | Approach and Plan | Progress and Next Steps |
---|---|---|
|
|
|
Background and References
This project can be closely coupled with Data Persisting project