Difference between revisions of "2016 Winter Project Week/Projects/PatchRegistration"
From NAMIC Wiki
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Image:PW-MIT2016.png|[[2016_Winter_Project_Week#Projects|Projects List]] | Image:PW-MIT2016.png|[[2016_Winter_Project_Week#Projects|Projects List]] | ||
Image:WMH_T1.png|Clinical Stroke Image | Image:WMH_T1.png|Clinical Stroke Image | ||
| + | Image:MRFRegresult.png|Current Resulting registration on isotropic Buckner images illustrated via segmentation overlap from an atlas. | ||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
| Line 26: | Line 27: | ||
| | | | ||
<!-- Add a bulleted list of key points --> | <!-- Add a bulleted list of key points --> | ||
| − | * | + | * We have an implementation of patch-based discrete registration using a standard patch distance metric. We'll start by evaluating this current metric on isotropic images |
| + | * We'll develop the infrastracture and evaluate the current metric on isotropic data at large. | ||
| + | * We'll develop a new metric for sparse images and test it out. | ||
| | | | ||
<!-- Fill this out at the end of Project Week; describe what you did this week and what you plan to do next --> | <!-- Fill this out at the end of Project Week; describe what you did this week and what you plan to do next --> | ||
| − | * | + | * We set up registration on a buckner40 dataset with a large number of parameters and launched on a large cluster |
| + | * We found a global setting that yields very good results, with volume overlap (DICE) of most subcortical structures in the 80s and 90s. | ||
| + | * Results shown above | ||
|} | |} | ||
Latest revision as of 15:10, 8 January 2016
Home < 2016 Winter Project Week < Projects < PatchRegistration
Clinical Stroke Image
Current Resulting registration on isotropic Buckner images illustrated via segmentation overlap from an atlas.
Key Investigators
- Adrian Dalca (MIT)
- Andreea Bobu (MIT)
- Polina Golland (MIT)
Project Description
Due to the low quality of clinical images (often with many artifacts, 7mm thick slices, etc), most standard algorithms, such as those for registration, segmentation, and analysis, will fail. In part, this is because registration algorithm depend on assumptions of smooth anatomical structures and good quality images, which are not present in these sparse clinical acquisitions. Here, we are investigating a patch-based discrete image registration which allows for more versatile image metrics and does not impose similar assumptions.
| Objective | Approach and Plan | Progress and Next Steps |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
