Difference between revisions of "2017 Winter Project Week/Integrative Intraoperative Interface"
From NAMIC Wiki
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | __NOTOC__ | ||
| + | <gallery> | ||
| + | Image:PW-Winter2017.png|link=2017_Winter_Project_Week#Projects|[[2017_Winter_Project_Week#Projects|Projects List]] | ||
| + | <!-- Use the "Upload file" link on the left and then add a line to this list like "File:MyAlgorithmScreenshot.png" --> | ||
| + | </gallery> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
==Key Investigators== | ==Key Investigators== | ||
<!-- Add a bulleted list of investigators and their institutions here --> | <!-- Add a bulleted list of investigators and their institutions here --> | ||
| + | * Anna Roethe (Humboldt University and Charité University Hospital Berlin) | ||
* Rebekka Lauer (Humboldt University Berlin) | * Rebekka Lauer (Humboldt University Berlin) | ||
| − | |||
* Prashin Unadkat (Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston) | * Prashin Unadkat (Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston) | ||
* Sarah Frisken (Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston) | * Sarah Frisken (Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston) | ||
| Line 9: | Line 16: | ||
==Project Description== | ==Project Description== | ||
| − | The project aims to discuss the concept of integrative OR environments from a neurosurgical design perspective. Open questions to be addressed include qualitative standardization of information visualization for intraoperative use, integration of PACS and non-PACS imaging data sets, and ready-to-use image control setup operated by surgeons and staff. | + | The project aims to discuss the concept of integrative OR environments from a holistic neurosurgical design perspective. Open questions to be addressed include qualitative standardization of information visualization for intraoperative use, integration of PACS and non-PACS imaging data sets, and ready-to-use image control setup operated by surgeons and staff. During project week, the main focus will be on more elaborate use of already existing technology (e.g. multi-window mode of 3D Slicer). |
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
| Line 26: | Line 33: | ||
| | | | ||
<!-- Progress and Next steps bullet points (fill out at the end of project week) --> | <!-- Progress and Next steps bullet points (fill out at the end of project week) --> | ||
| − | * | + | * decision for further exploration of 3DSlicer as tool for image viewing and image control in neurosurgery |
| + | * pre-analysis and evaluation of intraoperative image setup and control | ||
| + | ** identification of primary (PACS) and optional (non-PACS) image sources by type of case | ||
| + | ** testing freedom of dynamic interaction with and manipulation of customized imaging display (number, size and arrangement of windowed content) | ||
| + | * start scenario: remote image control by dedicated person (delegation) | ||
| + | * future scenario: direct control by surgeon (e.g. via sterile touch screen) | ||
|} | |} | ||
Latest revision as of 20:01, 12 January 2017
Home < 2017 Winter Project Week < Integrative Intraoperative Interface
Key Investigators
- Anna Roethe (Humboldt University and Charité University Hospital Berlin)
- Rebekka Lauer (Humboldt University Berlin)
- Prashin Unadkat (Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston)
- Sarah Frisken (Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston)
Project Description
The project aims to discuss the concept of integrative OR environments from a holistic neurosurgical design perspective. Open questions to be addressed include qualitative standardization of information visualization for intraoperative use, integration of PACS and non-PACS imaging data sets, and ready-to-use image control setup operated by surgeons and staff. During project week, the main focus will be on more elaborate use of already existing technology (e.g. multi-window mode of 3D Slicer).
| Objective | Approach and Plan | Progress and Next Steps |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
