|
|
| (23 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | == Currently ==
| + | <big>'''Note:''' We are migrating this content to the slicer.org domain - <font color="orange">The newer page is [https://www.slicer.org/wiki/Slicer3:EventBroker here]</font></big> |
| − | The basic idea of the EventBroker is that currently we have a lot of this kind of code in GUIs:
| |
| − | | |
| − | node->AddObserver(vtkCommand::ModifiedEvent, callbackCommand)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Problems ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | The problems with this:
| |
| − | | |
| − | * node 'owns' the observer, but the callbackCommand is opaque so it doesn't know anything about what will happen when the event is invoked
| |
| − | | |
| − | * the GUI needs to explicitly remove the observer before it is destroyed
| |
| − | | |
| − | * node is not introspectable; you cannot get a list of observers on the node
| |
| − | | |
| − | * there's no easy way to know what side effects will happen for any Set call (either a priori or experimentally).
| |
| − | | |
| − | * there's no way to collapse events or disable them
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Goals for Solution ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | So the EventBroker would be a singleton, perhaps owned by the ApplicationLogic that would look something like:
| |
| − | | |
| − | broker->RegisterObserver(node, vtkCommand::ModifiedEvent, this, callbackCommand);
| |
| − | | |
| − | The broker would do the following: | |
| − | | |
| − | * add DeleteEvent observers to both node and this so it can remove the observer automatically if either side is destroyed
| |
| − | | |
| − | * keep an introspectable list of all observers it knows about
| |
| − | | |
| − | * have an option to keep a log of all event invocations for debugging and performance analysis
| |
| − | | |
| − | * have an option to turn off all event invocations
| |
| − | | |
| − | * have an option to queue all event invocations and invoke them later
| |
| − | | |
| − | * have methods to collapse redundant events in the queue
| |
| − | | |
| − | * perhaps have method to pass event invocations from a processing thread to the main GUI thread?
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | Additional possible extensions:
| |
| − | | |
| − | * rather than maintaining a distinct queue, the broker could queue events into the GUI event queue
| |
| − | | |
| − | * the event queue could be protected by a mutex lock so that multiple threads can access the MRML scene in parallel but only the GUI thread talks to the display
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==References==
| |
| − | | |
| − | * [http://java.sun.com/products/jms/javadoc-102a/index.html Java Message Service (JMS) API]
| |
| − | * [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observer_pattern Wikipedia definition of Observer Pattern]
| |
| − | * [http://xlobject.sourceforge A C++ implementation]
| |
| − | * [http://sigslot.sourceforge.net/ Another C++ implementation]
| |
| − | * [http://doc.trolltech.com/4.3/signalsandslots.html The Qt implementation]
| |
