Difference between revisions of "DBP:Harvard:Software:Minutes:8"
From NAMIC Wiki
m (Update from Wiki) |
m (Update from Wiki) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | ==== DTI Meeting Minutes | August 9, 2006 ==== | |
− | ''Present:'' | + | <br />'''Present:''' Doug, Marc, Marek, Gordon, Sylvain, Katharina, Toshiro |
− | <br />''' | + | <br />'''Scanning Update:''' |
− | + | * 7 subjects were scanned yesterday. Biggest logistical hurdle is reconstruction time--holds up scanning for 25 minutes | |
+ | * Data is on the network, but needs to be assigned case numbers | ||
+ | * Sylvain made tensors for the new cases | ||
+ | ** One case had FAT artifact, may be bad enough that we will have to bring the subject back | ||
+ | ** There is a bug in Slicer where the 3D view and the slice view are decoupled | ||
+ | ** 2 cases are sheared strangely--the oblique acquisition may be causing this, may be measurement frame. | ||
+ | * Gordon suggested that we experiment with scanning a subject with head rotated at 45deg. | ||
+ | * Also, if possible the scheme of gradient directions should be changed (need to talk to NanQuei) | ||
− | <br />''' | + | <br />'''DWI inspection for new data:''' |
− | + | * Gordon presented a method for inspecting sequences of DWIs to look for drops in signal or other artifacts. Baseline images and gradient images in a composite, cycling through slices to see abrupt changes in intensity. | |
− | + | * With the new data, a lot of problems are obvious: zipper lines, dropped DWIs, uneven drops in intensity within a single DWI, motion artifacts, FAT artifact (shows up well in AvGradient image) | |
− | + | * PNL can use this method to inspect every new DTI case that comes in | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |
Latest revision as of 13:55, 18 December 2006
Home < DBP:Harvard:Software:Minutes:8DTI Meeting Minutes | August 9, 2006
Present: Doug, Marc, Marek, Gordon, Sylvain, Katharina, Toshiro
Scanning Update:
- 7 subjects were scanned yesterday. Biggest logistical hurdle is reconstruction time--holds up scanning for 25 minutes
- Data is on the network, but needs to be assigned case numbers
- Sylvain made tensors for the new cases
- One case had FAT artifact, may be bad enough that we will have to bring the subject back
- There is a bug in Slicer where the 3D view and the slice view are decoupled
- 2 cases are sheared strangely--the oblique acquisition may be causing this, may be measurement frame.
- Gordon suggested that we experiment with scanning a subject with head rotated at 45deg.
- Also, if possible the scheme of gradient directions should be changed (need to talk to NanQuei)
DWI inspection for new data:
- Gordon presented a method for inspecting sequences of DWIs to look for drops in signal or other artifacts. Baseline images and gradient images in a composite, cycling through slices to see abrupt changes in intensity.
- With the new data, a lot of problems are obvious: zipper lines, dropped DWIs, uneven drops in intensity within a single DWI, motion artifacts, FAT artifact (shows up well in AvGradient image)
- PNL can use this method to inspect every new DTI case that comes in