|
|
| (11 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | =Background=
| |
| − | ==Audiences==
| |
| − | * Clinical/research end users: need simple, efficient, relatively intuitive workflow to generate tractography and perform selection and statistics operations.
| |
| − | * Pipeline users: the underlying implementations need to be abstracted sufficiently to allow creation of pipeline tools for large-study purposes.
| |
| − | * Clinical developers: integrate DTI functionality for domain-specific purposes (neurosurgery, neurology, etc.)
| |
| − | * DTI Researchers:
| |
| − | ** Could use Slicer+ipython+numpy+... instead of matlab and custom code. Advantages: data-reading and visualization boilerplate code already exists. Challenges: learning curve; the python suite is less integrated than matlab, but it's getting better; relative stability: matlab rarely crashes.
| |
| − | ** Implementation of new algorithms in Slicer opens up larger potential userbase.
| |
| | | | |
| − | ==Slicer advantages==
| |
| − | See big list of DTI software here: [[User:inorton/DTI_Software_List]].
| |
| − |
| |
| − | There are several excellent DTI-centric applications. What advantages does Slicer have for DTI work?
| |
| − |
| |
| − | * More user-friendly data loading: TrackVis requires command line preprocessing; MedInria and TrackVis require manual gradient entry; DTI studio is limited to ROI exploration only (as far as I know)
| |
| − | * Many segmentation options already available - no external tool (TrackVis, DTI Studio) or separate interface (MedInria) required.
| |
| − | * Already integrated with intra-operative systems via OpenIGTLink functionality
| |
| − | * Open-source license (TrackVis closed, MedInria non-commercial, DTI Studio closed)
| |
| − | * DicomToNRRDConverter test suite: test suite exists to validate DICOM loading from many different scanner types, with special emphasis on DTI private header information.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==Slicer disadvantages==
| |
| − | (this is referring to Slicer3 interactive DTMRI tools: these areas need improvement in Slicer 4)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | * Current fiber data model is inefficient for interactive use on large sets (tens of thousands) of fiber tracts.
| |
| − | * Missing good interactive ROI selection, clustering, and editing capability for pre-computed fibersets.
| |
| − | * Need subset selection and coloring.
| |
| − | * Labelmap seeding is not multi-threaded so whole-brain tractography takes forever.
| |
| − | * Disjointed interface: no integrated GUI for full DICOMs->tracts->measurements workflow.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | =Existing NA-MIC resources=
| |
| − |
| |
| − | * teem: the Slicer3 interactive DTI implementation is based largely on teem through the vtkTeem libraries.
| |
| − | ** http://teem.sourceforge.net/
| |
| − | * GTRACT: command-line tools for DTI pipeline processing
| |
| − | ** http://www.nitrc.org/projects/vmagnotta/
| |
| − | ** http://wiki.slicer.org/slicerWiki/index.php/GTRACT_V4
| |
| − | * UNC DTI Tools (FiberViewer):
| |
| − | ** http://www.niral.unc.edu/
| |
| − | ** http://www.ia.unc.edu/dev/download/index.htm
| |
| − |
| |
| − | =Existing open-source external resources=
| |
| − | See big list of DTI software here: [[User:inorton/DTI_Software_List]]
| |
| − | * (BSD-like licenses)
| |
| − | * DiPy: diffusion imaging in python. Currently pre/alpha but in active development. (BSD license)
| |
| − | ** http://nipy.sourceforge.net/dipy/
| |
| − | * DTI-query and CINCH: (BSD license)
| |
| − | ** http://graphics.stanford.edu/projects/dti/
| |
