Difference between revisions of "2013 Project Week:XNATSlicer"
From NAMIC Wiki
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
<gallery> | <gallery> | ||
| − | Image: | + | Image:XNATSlicerSC1.png|Screen shot |
| − | |||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
| − | |||
==Key Investigators== | ==Key Investigators== | ||
| Line 19: | Line 16: | ||
<div style="width: 27%; float: left; padding-right: 3%;"> | <div style="width: 27%; float: left; padding-right: 3%;"> | ||
<h3>Approach, Plan</h3> | <h3>Approach, Plan</h3> | ||
| − | * | + | * Determine most appropriate libraries for handling XNAT communications (esp. SSL-related). |
* Multiplatform issues (related to libraries) | * Multiplatform issues (related to libraries) | ||
* UX motivation - why the simplicity? | * UX motivation - why the simplicity? | ||
Latest revision as of 12:25, 6 January 2013
Home < 2013 Project Week:XNATSlicer
Screen shot
Key Investigators
- Dan Marcus, Sunil Kumar, Steve Pieper
Project Description
Objective
- We are building a Slicer module that aims to integrate XNAT with Slicer.
- We will discuss the current state and motivations for our approach.
Approach, Plan
- Determine most appropriate libraries for handling XNAT communications (esp. SSL-related).
- Multiplatform issues (related to libraries)
- UX motivation - why the simplicity?
- Testing
Progress
- Currently in need of more testers.
