Difference between revisions of "2014 Project Week Breakout Session: IGT Neuro"

From NAMIC Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Agenda:
 
Agenda:
  
Moderator: Alexanda Golby,
+
Session Moderators: Alexanda Golby, Tina Kapur
Attendees: Alireza Mehrtash, Isaiah Norton, Alex Y, Ron, Tina, Steve, Andras Lasso, Rahul Sastry
 
  
 +
Attendees: Alireza Mehrtash, Isaiah Norton, Alex Yarmakovich, Ron, Steve, Andras Lasso, Rahul Sastry, Jayshree Kalpathy Cramer, Dominik Meier, Matt Toews, Luiz Murta, Chenxi Zhang, Marcel Prastawa, Kanglin, Laurent Chauvin, Vivek Narayan, Tamas Ungi, Alexander, Adam Rankin, Tassilo Klein, Saskia Camp, Keryn Palmer, Katarina B, Sneha Durgapal, Tammy R, Pete Anderson, Robin Kouver, Nassem, Neerav Patel, Yangming, Jim Miller
  
*demo of "dynamic pre-defined slice reconstruction"
+
*ultrasound visualization in context of MR
 +
**demo of current ultrasound trajectory+reconstructed data in Slicer [http://youtu.be/ck8wfr2I-Zg Demo-1], [http://youtu.be/CA1LZyahD6E Demo-2]
 +
**next step: we need "dynamic pre-defined slice reconstruction" (or slice painting)?
 
*visualize temporal progression of 3D ultrasound -- save various timepoints and be able to toggle between them  
 
*visualize temporal progression of 3D ultrasound -- save various timepoints and be able to toggle between them  
 
**sometimes during resection the stuff near the probe-tissue interface appears to be residual tumor, and it would be useful to go back to a previous timepoint to see the original tumor extent
 
**sometimes during resection the stuff near the probe-tissue interface appears to be residual tumor, and it would be useful to go back to a previous timepoint to see the original tumor extent
*feedback during ultrasound acquisition
+
*feedback during ultrasound acquisition [http://youtu.be/fGkG6LTWn6g Demo]
 
**guidance on when sweep is done (full volume is covered)
 
**guidance on when sweep is done (full volume is covered)
 
**is the quality of recon is good enough
 
**is the quality of recon is good enough
Line 14: Line 16:
 
*aiding interpretation of ultrasound
 
*aiding interpretation of ultrasound
 
**blood vs. saline
 
**blood vs. saline
 +
 +
*ultrasound annotation during the case
  
 
*UKF tractography in neurosurgery
 
*UKF tractography in neurosurgery
 +
 +
*Brainlab point collection/acquisition -- interface with Slicer

Latest revision as of 15:05, 26 June 2014

Home < 2014 Project Week Breakout Session: IGT Neuro

Agenda:

Session Moderators: Alexanda Golby, Tina Kapur

Attendees: Alireza Mehrtash, Isaiah Norton, Alex Yarmakovich, Ron, Steve, Andras Lasso, Rahul Sastry, Jayshree Kalpathy Cramer, Dominik Meier, Matt Toews, Luiz Murta, Chenxi Zhang, Marcel Prastawa, Kanglin, Laurent Chauvin, Vivek Narayan, Tamas Ungi, Alexander, Adam Rankin, Tassilo Klein, Saskia Camp, Keryn Palmer, Katarina B, Sneha Durgapal, Tammy R, Pete Anderson, Robin Kouver, Nassem, Neerav Patel, Yangming, Jim Miller

  • ultrasound visualization in context of MR
    • demo of current ultrasound trajectory+reconstructed data in Slicer Demo-1, Demo-2
    • next step: we need "dynamic pre-defined slice reconstruction" (or slice painting)?
  • visualize temporal progression of 3D ultrasound -- save various timepoints and be able to toggle between them
    • sometimes during resection the stuff near the probe-tissue interface appears to be residual tumor, and it would be useful to go back to a previous timepoint to see the original tumor extent
  • feedback during ultrasound acquisition Demo
    • guidance on when sweep is done (full volume is covered)
    • is the quality of recon is good enough
  • aiding interpretation of ultrasound
    • blood vs. saline
  • ultrasound annotation during the case
  • UKF tractography in neurosurgery
  • Brainlab point collection/acquisition -- interface with Slicer