Difference between revisions of "2015 Summer Project Week:USRecon"
From NAMIC Wiki
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
<div style="width: 27%; float: left; padding-right: 3%;"> | <div style="width: 27%; float: left; padding-right: 3%;"> | ||
<h3>Objective</h3> | <h3>Objective</h3> | ||
| + | * Evaluate resolution limits of ultrasound 3D reconstruction by comparing feature detection on a phantom. | ||
| + | ** Study effect of tracking variabilities and tracker/image synchronization on reconstruction accuracy | ||
| + | ** Consider what inherent limitations are imposed by the resolution of the US | ||
| + | ** Compare to gold standard uCT | ||
* Integrate the TeleMed US scanner with PLUS and Slicer | * Integrate the TeleMed US scanner with PLUS and Slicer | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:45, 26 June 2015
Home < 2015 Summer Project Week:USRecon
Got it working
Result
MicroCT
Photograph
Key Investigators
- Steve Pieper
- Tamas Ungi
- Mikael Brudfords
Project Description
Objective
- Evaluate resolution limits of ultrasound 3D reconstruction by comparing feature detection on a phantom.
- Study effect of tracking variabilities and tracker/image synchronization on reconstruction accuracy
- Consider what inherent limitations are imposed by the resolution of the US
- Compare to gold standard uCT
- Integrate the TeleMed US scanner with PLUS and Slicer
Approach, Plan
- Hook up the tracked Ultrasound
- Test with Elephantom
- Compare with microCT gold standard
Progress
- Used 3D printed tracker holder
- Made several test scans
- Experimented with limits of current implementation and inherent limitations of the probe
- PLUS TeleMed through OpenIGTLink / SlicerIGT works great!
