Difference between revisions of "DBP 2010"
From NAMIC Wiki
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
The DBP's for the 2010 round will be solicited by Ron Kikinis in consultation with the core 1 and core 2 PI's. The will participate in the development and implementation of the competitive renewal. Specifics of this process will be determined after the RFA has been released. | The DBP's for the 2010 round will be solicited by Ron Kikinis in consultation with the core 1 and core 2 PI's. The will participate in the development and implementation of the competitive renewal. Specifics of this process will be determined after the RFA has been released. | ||
− | = | + | = Steps = |
− | == Prerequisites == | + | == Prerequisites for candidate groups== |
* Candidates have to have existing NIH funding as PI or co-investigator | * Candidates have to have existing NIH funding as PI or co-investigator | ||
* Joint publications with at least one Core 1 or Core 2 member. | * Joint publications with at least one Core 1 or Core 2 member. | ||
− | * Willingness to adopt the NA-MIC kit | + | * Willingness to fully adopt the NA-MIC kit |
− | * Willingness to use DBP funds to hire | + | * NA-MIC funds are NOT to be used for data acquisition |
+ | * Willingness to use DBP funds to hire a software engineer to help | ||
+ | ** adoption of the NA-MIC kit by the DBP group and | ||
+ | ** customization of Na-mic software towards the needs of the DBP. | ||
− | == Spring 2009: First stage | + | == Spring 2009: First stage == |
We intend to minimize the effort for both the candidates and the decision makers. For your convenience, you can refer potential DBP candidates to our short [[Media:Na-mic-overview.doc|NA-MIC overview]]. We are looking for a short text that addresses the following points: | We intend to minimize the effort for both the candidates and the decision makers. For your convenience, you can refer potential DBP candidates to our short [[Media:Na-mic-overview.doc|NA-MIC overview]]. We are looking for a short text that addresses the following points: |
Revision as of 13:31, 12 September 2008
Home < DBP 2010Back to DBP changeover main page
Contents
Selection Process
Motivations and Procedure
The original RFA specified the following:
- In core 3, an investigator will propose 2-4 collaborations with NIH funded biomedical or behavioral researchers to address a biomedical/behavioral question using computational approaches. It is not essential that the biomedical researchers have expertise in computational biology, but they should have a question that will drive the fundamental computational research in cores 1 and 2. The purpose of this core is to ensure that the research carried out in cores 1 and 2 has direct relevance to biomedical or behavioral research. It may be useful for these Driving Biological Projects (DPB's) to have a focus on a particular disease or organ, but that sort of focus might not be appropriate for all NIH NCBCs. It is expected that many of the biomedical researchers in core 3 will not be at the same institution as the parent NIH NCBC. In such cases, convincing plans for collaboration at a distance must be presented in the proposal.
The DBP's for the 2010 round will be solicited by Ron Kikinis in consultation with the core 1 and core 2 PI's. The will participate in the development and implementation of the competitive renewal. Specifics of this process will be determined after the RFA has been released.
Steps
Prerequisites for candidate groups
- Candidates have to have existing NIH funding as PI or co-investigator
- Joint publications with at least one Core 1 or Core 2 member.
- Willingness to fully adopt the NA-MIC kit
- NA-MIC funds are NOT to be used for data acquisition
- Willingness to use DBP funds to hire a software engineer to help
- adoption of the NA-MIC kit by the DBP group and
- customization of Na-mic software towards the needs of the DBP.
Spring 2009: First stage
We intend to minimize the effort for both the candidates and the decision makers. For your convenience, you can refer potential DBP candidates to our short NA-MIC overview. We are looking for a short text that addresses the following points:
- Abstract from the qualifying NIH grant (or comparable short description of the driving project), grant # and program officer
- What is the history with the core 1 or core 2 "sponsor" (1 paragraph)
- What is the benefit to the DBP applicant (1 paragraph)
- What is the benefit to NA-MIC (1 paragraph)