Difference between revisions of "2008 IGT Project Week Nonrigid MR-ULS Registration Algorithms for Neurosurgery, Prostate MRgFUS and Brachytherapy"
From NAMIC Wiki
(New page: Back to 2008_IGT_Project_Week#Projects Team: Goals: Approach: Results (to be completed and presented at the end of the week):) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Back to [[2008_IGT_Project_Week#Projects]] | Back to [[2008_IGT_Project_Week#Projects]] | ||
| − | Team: | + | Team:Sandy Wells, Michel, Tina Kapur, Matt Toews, Nathan McDannold, Ben Schwartz |
| − | Goals: | + | Goals: To continue the discussions from the IGT Non-rigid registration breakout |
| + | **To discuss the clinical requirements (accuracy, speed, workflow) of these three problems | ||
| + | **To discuss the various approaches underway within our group | ||
| + | **Is there a commercial solution that we should bootstrap from? | ||
| + | **Each group to bring a data set for visual inspection by the rest | ||
Approach: | Approach: | ||
| + | This is a discussion group. | ||
Results (to be completed and presented at the end of the week): | Results (to be completed and presented at the end of the week): | ||
Revision as of 16:01, 4 December 2008
Home < 2008 IGT Project Week Nonrigid MR-ULS Registration Algorithms for Neurosurgery, Prostate MRgFUS and BrachytherapyBack to 2008_IGT_Project_Week#Projects
Team:Sandy Wells, Michel, Tina Kapur, Matt Toews, Nathan McDannold, Ben Schwartz
Goals: To continue the discussions from the IGT Non-rigid registration breakout
- To discuss the clinical requirements (accuracy, speed, workflow) of these three problems
- To discuss the various approaches underway within our group
- Is there a commercial solution that we should bootstrap from?
- Each group to bring a data set for visual inspection by the rest
Approach: This is a discussion group.
Results (to be completed and presented at the end of the week):
