Difference between revisions of "2009 Winter Project Week Python"
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
* Luca Antiga (Medical Imaging Unit, Biomedical Engineering Department, Mario Negri Institute) | * Luca Antiga (Medical Imaging Unit, Biomedical Engineering Department, Mario Negri Institute) | ||
* Steve Piper (Isomics) | * Steve Piper (Isomics) | ||
| + | * Demian Wasserman (INRIA) | ||
<div style="margin: 20px;"> | <div style="margin: 20px;"> | ||
| Line 37: | Line 38: | ||
As for packaging problems, testing will have to be performed on several architectures. | As for packaging problems, testing will have to be performed on several architectures. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Finally, documentation will be improved. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 19:25, 10 December 2008
Home < 2009 Winter Project Week Python
Key Investigators
- Luca Antiga (Medical Imaging Unit, Biomedical Engineering Department, Mario Negri Institute)
- Steve Piper (Isomics)
- Demian Wasserman (INRIA)
Objective
To finalize the implementation of the Slicer Python interface and solve packaging problems linked to Scipy.
Approach, Plan
The Slicer Python interface now works well for both non-interactive and interactive modules. A few improvements are still needed, namely
- calling VTK static methods - e.g. slicer.vtkMath.Norm(v)
- handling modified arguments - e.g. slicer.vtkMath::Normalize(v)
- defining methods with the exact number of arguments (now it's not constrained, so if it's wrong Tcl complains) - this will require a patch on the VTK Tcl wrappers
- fix a memory leak associated with Python scripted modules
- review the Slicer Python to Numpy code and eventually extend it to handle more general image or data types
As for packaging problems, testing will have to be performed on several architectures.
Finally, documentation will be improved.
Progress
TODO
