Difference between revisions of "CTSC Brad Dickerson, MGH"
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
=Fundamental Requirements= | =Fundamental Requirements= | ||
− | + | * accessibility | |
− | + | * redundancy | |
=Data= | =Data= |
Revision as of 21:04, 27 July 2009
Home < CTSC Brad Dickerson, MGHBack to CTSC Imaging Informatics Initiative
Contents
Mission
See http://www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/~bradd/research.html
Use-Case Goals
The first two steps in the retrospective OFRR1 (Object Free Recall and Recognition) use-case include Basic Data Management and Query Formulation. (Eventually want to upload two projects with matching subjectIDs).
- Step 1: Data Management Describe and upload retrospective OFRR1 datasets (roughly 1 terabyte) and confirm appropriate organization and naming scheme via web GUI.
- Step 2: Query Formulation
- make specific queries using XNAT web services,
- ensure that query results match those returned by analogous searches on the local file system.
Participants
- sites involved: MGH NMR center
- number of users: >10
- PI: Brad Dickerson
- staff: Akram Bakkour & Mike Brickhouse (Study coordinator/MRI technician/Lab manager)
- clinicians
- IT staff: NMR could provide IT support
Outcome Metrics
Step 1: Data Management
- Visual confirmation (via web GUI) that all data is present, organized and named appropriately
- How quickly can data of interest be identified via web GUI
- Can data be successfully & efficiently downloaded from XNAT to local file system.
- How does network interruption affect query/download process.
- other?
Step 2: Query Formulation
- Successful tests that responses to XNAT queries (for all subjectIDs within some age range and with an MR with particular resolution) results returned from search on the local file system.
Fundamental Requirements
- accessibility
- redundancy
Data
The Dickerson lab has about 250 scans for their own studies, and 150 scans for collaborators. Scans include both MRI and fMRI. Other data are stored with Excel spreadsheets.
- Project
- Imaging Modalities
- Genetic
- Storage needs
Images files are currently scattered over several file servers on the same network.
Workflows
Current Data Management Process
DICOM files are transferred from the scanners (PACS?) to a local DICOM Server, and then copied to lab machines Images are processed with FreeSurfer.
- Other software to be integrated (e.g., Osirix)
- other features
Target Data Management Process (Step 1.)
Target Query Formulation (Step 2.)
Target Processing Workflow (Step 3.)
Other Information
There have been at least two serious attempts using XNAT, working with XNAT support group (NRG) at Harvard. An XNAT with customized schema was developed by Eli White a couple of years ago on Dory at NMR.
The lab recognizes the need for an XNAT-based system to manage images and other data.