Difference between revisions of "Projects:NonparametricSegmentation"

From NAMIC Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 8: Line 8:
 
[1] X. Artaechevarria, A. Munoz-Barrutia, and C. Ortiz de Solorzano. Combination strategies in multi-atlas image segmentation:
 
[1] X. Artaechevarria, A. Munoz-Barrutia, and C. Ortiz de Solorzano. Combination strategies in multi-atlas image segmentation:
 
Application to brain MR data. IEEE Tran. Med. Imaging, 28(8):1266 – 1277, 2009.
 
Application to brain MR data. IEEE Tran. Med. Imaging, 28(8):1266 – 1277, 2009.
 +
 
[2] R.A. Heckemann, J.V. Hajnal, P. Aljabar, D. Rueckert, and A. Hammers. Automatic anatomical brain MRI segmentation
 
[2] R.A. Heckemann, J.V. Hajnal, P. Aljabar, D. Rueckert, and A. Hammers. Automatic anatomical brain MRI segmentation
 
combining label propagation and decision fusion. Neuroimage, 33(1):115–126, 2006.
 
combining label propagation and decision fusion. Neuroimage, 33(1):115–126, 2006.
 +
 
[3] T. Rohlfing, R. Brandt, R. Menzel, and C.R. Maurer. Evaluation of atlas selection strategies for atlas-based image
 
[3] T. Rohlfing, R. Brandt, R. Menzel, and C.R. Maurer. Evaluation of atlas selection strategies for atlas-based image
 
segmentation with application to confocal microscopy images of bee brains. NeuroImage, 21(4):1428–1442, 2004.
 
segmentation with application to confocal microscopy images of bee brains. NeuroImage, 21(4):1428–1442, 2004.

Revision as of 18:53, 10 September 2009

Home < Projects:NonparametricSegmentation

Introduction

We propose a non-parametric, probabilistic model for the automatic segmentation of medical images, given a training set of images and corresponding label maps. The resulting inference algorithms we develop rely on pairwise registrations between the test image and individual training images. The training labels are then transferred to the test image and fused to compute a final segmentation of the test subject. Label fusion methods have been shown to yield accurate segmentation, since the use of multiple registrations captures greater inter-subject anatomical variability and improves robustness against occasional registration failures, cf. [1,2,3]. To the best of our knowledge, this project presents the first comprehensive probabilistic framework that rigorously motivates label fusion as a segmentation approach. The proposed framework allows us to compare different label fusion algorithms theoretically and practically. In particular, recent label fusion or multi-atlas segmentation algorithms are interpreted as special cases of our framework.


Literature

[1] X. Artaechevarria, A. Munoz-Barrutia, and C. Ortiz de Solorzano. Combination strategies in multi-atlas image segmentation: Application to brain MR data. IEEE Tran. Med. Imaging, 28(8):1266 – 1277, 2009.

[2] R.A. Heckemann, J.V. Hajnal, P. Aljabar, D. Rueckert, and A. Hammers. Automatic anatomical brain MRI segmentation combining label propagation and decision fusion. Neuroimage, 33(1):115–126, 2006.

[3] T. Rohlfing, R. Brandt, R. Menzel, and C.R. Maurer. Evaluation of atlas selection strategies for atlas-based image segmentation with application to confocal microscopy images of bee brains. NeuroImage, 21(4):1428–1442, 2004.