Difference between revisions of "2010 Slicer36 Module Cull"

From NAMIC Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 11: Line 11:
 
**In-module help and acknowledgment mandatory
 
**In-module help and acknowledgment mandatory
 
**remainder up to the contributors
 
**remainder up to the contributors
*Luis crteria for success:
+
*Luis Ibanez' score system:
**Label extensions by a level of compliance with NAMIC practices ?
+
** Gold:   have > 80% coverage,     0 Valgrind errors, documentation and tutorial
*** E.g. Gold, Silver, Bronze,... Coal.
+
** Silver: have > 70% coverage, <   10 Valgrind errors, documentation and tutorial
*** Gold: have > 80% coverage, 0 Valgrind errors, documentation and tutorial
+
** Bronze: have > 60% coverage, <   50 Valgrind errors, documentation and tutorial
*** Silver: have > 70% coverage, < 10 Valgrind errors, and tutorial
+
** Coal:   have < 10% coverage, > 1000 Valgrind errors, no documentation, no tutorial
*** Bronze: have > 60% coverage, < 50 Valgrind errors, and tutorial
 
*** Coal: have < 10% coverage, > 1000 Valgrind errors, no documentation, no tutorial
 

Revision as of 11:39, 14 April 2010

Home < 2010 Slicer36 Module Cull
  • Review session is open to all Slicer developers and project leadership.
  • Call-in will be available
  • We will begin the session in 1249 Boylston St. at 11am on Thursday 4/29.
  • Review documentation and status of module candidates for Slicer 3.6
  • Perform Cull using the following criteria
  • Extensions:
    • In-module help and acknowledgment mandatory
    • remainder up to the contributors
  • Luis Ibanez' score system:
    • Gold: have > 80% coverage, 0 Valgrind errors, documentation and tutorial
    • Silver: have > 70% coverage, < 10 Valgrind errors, documentation and tutorial
    • Bronze: have > 60% coverage, < 50 Valgrind errors, documentation and tutorial
    • Coal: have < 10% coverage, > 1000 Valgrind errors, no documentation, no tutorial