Difference between revisions of "2010 Summer Project Week RegistrationEvaluation"
Jfishbaugh (talk | contribs) |
Jfishbaugh (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
This experiment consists of registration between a baseline MRI and one with a synthetic tumor inserted via [http://www.ucnia.org/softwaredata/5-tumordata/10-simtumordb.html TumorSim]. Furthermore, we will deform the baseline image with a known deformation field. We can evaluate both the transformed image for accuracy as well as the deformation field computed during registration. An interesting extension is to investigate how the size of the tumor or strength of the deformation effects registration accuracy. | This experiment consists of registration between a baseline MRI and one with a synthetic tumor inserted via [http://www.ucnia.org/softwaredata/5-tumordata/10-simtumordb.html TumorSim]. Furthermore, we will deform the baseline image with a known deformation field. We can evaluate both the transformed image for accuracy as well as the deformation field computed during registration. An interesting extension is to investigate how the size of the tumor or strength of the deformation effects registration accuracy. | ||
− | '''Multi-modal | + | '''Co-registration of Subject Specific Multi-modal MRI and DTI''' |
− | This experiment consists of multi-modal data from an individual with a severe head injury. | + | This experiment consists of multi-modal MRI as well as DTI data from an individual with a severe head injury. |
'''Registration of Atrial Fibrillation Pre and Post Treatment''' | '''Registration of Atrial Fibrillation Pre and Post Treatment''' |
Revision as of 00:27, 11 June 2010
Home < 2010 Summer Project Week RegistrationEvaluationKey Investigators
- University of Utah: James Fishbaugh, Guido Gerig
- BWH: Dominik Meier
Objective
Recently, effort has been made in improving registration in Slicer. This includes the development and improvement of the RegisterImages module along with corresponding documentation from the use case library . The work on RegisterImages aimed at making registration easier, faster, and more accurate, while the use case library acts as a starting point and tutorial for users with a particular type of registration problem.
In order to continue improving registration, we propose a project to evaluate the current state of non-linear registration in Slicer. The results from this study will likely highlight areas of both strength and weakness in registration currently available in Slicer.
Approach, Plan
We propose evaluating registration in Slicer by focusing on three experiments:
Synthetic Example
This experiment consists of registration between a baseline MRI and one with a synthetic tumor inserted via TumorSim. Furthermore, we will deform the baseline image with a known deformation field. We can evaluate both the transformed image for accuracy as well as the deformation field computed during registration. An interesting extension is to investigate how the size of the tumor or strength of the deformation effects registration accuracy.
Co-registration of Subject Specific Multi-modal MRI and DTI
This experiment consists of multi-modal MRI as well as DTI data from an individual with a severe head injury.
Registration of Atrial Fibrillation Pre and Post Treatment