Difference between revisions of "Slicer-4.1"

From NAMIC Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 30: Line 30:
  
 
= Open Questions =
 
= Open Questions =
* Is it realistic to try for SimpleITK in this release?
+
* Is it realistic to try for SimpleITK in this release? (After discussion: no, needs more testing - aim for summer project week)
 
** Yes, if somebody can help with ITK 4 on windows.
 
** Yes, if somebody can help with ITK 4 on windows.
 
** linux packaging issue
 
** linux packaging issue
Line 36: Line 36:
 
** possibly other issues on window (needs testing)
 
** possibly other issues on window (needs testing)
 
** need to try all the packaging platforms
 
** need to try all the packaging platforms
 +
 +
 
  [[Events|Back to events page]]
 
  [[Events|Back to events page]]

Revision as of 23:11, 9 February 2012

Home < Slicer-4.1

Target date for the code freeze is Monday. Feb. 27, 2012

Features and Responsibilities

  • Dicom widget: Steve
    • cget
    • pop up reorganization
    • Lollipop
  • Charts: Jim
    • Label statistics
  • compareviews and linking: Jim
    • bugs 1526, 1598, 1495, 1583, 1607, 1632, 1631, 1686 (or a subset)
  • VTK GPU raycaster: J2
    • linear ramp, crash in transfer function editor
  • View controller cosmetics: J2
  • Brainsfit cosmetics: Hans
  • Extensions: JC
    • Refine the mechanism to build/test/upload extensions.
    • Provide support to extension developers so that the following extensions are built:
      • ABC, SkullStripper, EMSegmenter, VMTK, Plastimatch, DVH/SlicerRt
  • Documentation: JC
    • Mechanism to easily "version" the documentation. (Easy creation of set of pages associated to release 4.1 from the pages prefixed with 4.0)
    • NiceToHave:
      • Offline documentation: Mobile skin for webkit rendering of the slicer wiki documentation pages
  • PythonQt: JC
    • Update CTK and Slicer to consider the contributed change to PythonQt
  • Fix for texture resolution: Alex
  • Update screen capture to reflect all possible layouts - Nicole

Open Questions

  • Is it realistic to try for SimpleITK in this release? (After discussion: no, needs more testing - aim for summer project week)
    • Yes, if somebody can help with ITK 4 on windows.
    • linux packaging issue
    • linux discovering CLI: missing symbol on exit
    • possibly other issues on window (needs testing)
    • need to try all the packaging platforms


Back to events page