Difference between revisions of "2014 Summer Project Week:Contours"
From NAMIC Wiki
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
==Project Description== | ==Project Description== | ||
| − | Continue on from the 2014 winter discussion and potentially integrate Contours into the core | + | Continue on from the 2014 winter discussion and potentially integrate Contours into the core |
<div style="margin: 20px;"> | <div style="margin: 20px;"> | ||
Revision as of 19:01, 23 June 2014
Home < 2014 Summer Project Week:Contours
Contour representations stored in the Contour object
Key Investigators
- Adam Rankin (Queen's University)
- Csaba Pinter (Queen's University)
Background
- Winter Contour Discussion
- Contours DisplayableManager and StorageNode SlicerRT ticket: #446
- Contours module source code (module UI, Contours MRML, conversion utilities, Subject hierarchy plugin)
Project Description
Continue on from the 2014 winter discussion and potentially integrate Contours into the core
Objective
- Ensure current implementation is satisfactory
- Some cleanup required (variable names, etc...)
- Current storage node implementation does not support Slicer packaged save
- Minor fix to use this->FileNameList instead of member variables
- Discuss any additional features to implement
- Determination of a source representation?
- Ideally the ROI points should always be source, and edits are propagated back to the ROI points
- ...
- Determination of a source representation?
- Prepare a pathway to core integration (maybe)
- Agree on the role of contours in the core
Approach, Plan
- Perform code cleanup, ensure passing tests
- Use breakout session as discussion platform
- Desired features
- Roadmap for core integration
- Implement discussed changes
Progress
Slicer built. Sort of.- It's alivvveee.....
