Difference between revisions of "ProstateNavigation workflow"
From NAMIC Wiki
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
<h3>Progress</h3> | <h3>Progress</h3> | ||
* Created requirements list containing the core functions of the workflow | * Created requirements list containing the core functions of the workflow | ||
| − | * | + | * Created draft of the GUI with its necessary components |
* Best solution for prostate segmentation seems to be VolumeClip Model (under 15 seconds user interaction time) | * Best solution for prostate segmentation seems to be VolumeClip Model (under 15 seconds user interaction time) | ||
* Started evaluation of BSpline registration module with masks | * Started evaluation of BSpline registration module with masks | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 23:39, 8 January 2015
Home < ProstateNavigation workflow
Key Investigators
Peter Behringer and Andrey Fedorov
Project Description
Objective
- Design an easy to use GUI for ProstateNavigation (Planning, Registration, Navigation)
- Get ideas how prostate segmentation can be done quicker, fully automatic in best case
- Validate different pre-op to intra-op registration approaches
Approach, Plan
- Create mockup GUI
- Try to use existing segmentation modules like Robust Statistics Segmenter or VolumeClip for quicker prostate segmentation
- Evaluate the segmentation results (DICE-Coefficient) by comparing to manual segmentation of trained radiologists using this dataset
- Evaluate pre-op to intra-op registration with General Registration (BRAINS) module in Slicer 4.4
Progress
- Created requirements list containing the core functions of the workflow
- Created draft of the GUI with its necessary components
- Best solution for prostate segmentation seems to be VolumeClip Model (under 15 seconds user interaction time)
- Started evaluation of BSpline registration module with masks
