Difference between revisions of "2015 BRAINSFit registration in SimpleITK"
From NAMIC Wiki
(Created page with '__NOTOC__ <gallery> Image:PW-Summer2015.png|Projects List </gallery> ==Key Investigators== * Peter Behringer * Andriy Fedorov ==Project De…') |
|||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
<div style="width: 27%; float: left; padding-right: 3%;"> | <div style="width: 27%; float: left; padding-right: 3%;"> | ||
<h3>Approach, Plan</h3> | <h3>Approach, Plan</h3> | ||
− | * | + | * Implement BRAINSFit functionality in SimpleITK |
− | * Get | + | * Get ideas from the community how the irregularity can be avoided and implemented in SimpleITK |
− | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div style="width: 27%; float: left; padding-right: 3%;"> | <div style="width: 27%; float: left; padding-right: 3%;"> | ||
<h3>Progress</h3> | <h3>Progress</h3> | ||
− | * Initialization and rigid registration | + | * Initialization and rigid registration is implemented using SimpleITK |
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> |
Revision as of 18:47, 4 June 2015
Home < 2015 BRAINSFit registration in SimpleITKKey Investigators
- Peter Behringer
- Andriy Fedorov
Project Description
Objective
- Our registration module for b-spline deformable registration of prostate MRI uses BRAINSFit in Slicer4/ITKv4.
- One issue that we are getting with ITKv4 is that are a lot more irregular and unrealistic than what we used to get in ITKv3 (see summary here
- The Slicer4/ITKv4 registration tool should be comparable with the functionality we had in Slicer3/ITKv3, which was evaluated here
Approach, Plan
- Implement BRAINSFit functionality in SimpleITK
- Get ideas from the community how the irregularity can be avoided and implemented in SimpleITK
Progress
- Initialization and rigid registration is implemented using SimpleITK