Difference between revisions of "2016 Winter Project Week/Projects/PatchRegistration"
From NAMIC Wiki
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Here, we are investigating a patch-based discrete image registration which allows for more versatile image metrics and does not impose similar assumptions. | Here, we are investigating a patch-based discrete image registration which allows for more versatile image metrics and does not impose similar assumptions. | ||
− | + | {| class="wikitable" | |
− | < | + | |- style="vertical-align:top;" |
+ | ! style="text-align: left; width:27%" | Objective | ||
+ | <!-- Add a bulleted list of key points --> | ||
* We will investigate a current implementation for patch-based discrete registration on sparse-slice data. | * We will investigate a current implementation for patch-based discrete registration on sparse-slice data. | ||
− | + | ! style="text-align: left; width:27%" | Approach, Plan | |
− | + | <!-- Add a bulleted list of key points --> | |
− | + | * | |
− | + | ! style="text-align: left; width:27%" | Progress | |
− | + | <!-- Fill this out at the end of Project Week; describe what you did this week and what you plan to do next --> | |
− | < | + | * |
− | + | |} | |
− |
Revision as of 22:20, 18 December 2015
Home < 2016 Winter Project Week < Projects < PatchRegistrationKey Investigators
- Adrian Dalca (MIT)
- Andreea Bobu (MIT)
- Polina Golland (MIT)
Project Description
Due to the low quality of clinical images (often with many artifacts, 7mm thick slices, etc), most standard algorithms, such as those for registration, segmentation, and analysis, will fail. In part, this is because registration algorithm depend on assumptions of smooth anatomical structures and good quality images, which are not present in these sparse clinical acquisitions. Here, we are investigating a patch-based discrete image registration which allows for more versatile image metrics and does not impose similar assumptions.
Objective
|
Approach, Plan
|
Progress
|
---|