Difference between revisions of "2017 Winter Project Week/LORDWI"

From NAMIC Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 20: Line 20:
 
* Discuss best ways to validate results (tractography, biomarkers, synthetic data, phantoms, others?). So far we have visually tested inter-subject registrations of HCP data and intra-subject multi-shell, and intra-subject on young brain tumor subjects.
 
* Discuss best ways to validate results (tractography, biomarkers, synthetic data, phantoms, others?). So far we have visually tested inter-subject registrations of HCP data and intra-subject multi-shell, and intra-subject on young brain tumor subjects.
 
* Consider if Slicer can be used in tandem for evaluation.  
 
* Consider if Slicer can be used in tandem for evaluation.  
 +
* This method introduces Mutual Information to nonrigid registration of DWI. Discuss if other similarity measures (e.g. correlation measures) would be better suited for specific problems.
 
|
 
|
 
<!-- Progress and Next steps bullet points (fill out at the end of project week) -->
 
<!-- Progress and Next steps bullet points (fill out at the end of project week) -->

Revision as of 15:32, 2 January 2017

Home < 2017 Winter Project Week < LORDWI

Key Investigators

  • Henrik Groenholt Jensen, UCPH
  • Lauren J. O'Donnell, BWH
  • Tina Kapur, BWH
  • Fan Zhang, BWH
  • Carl-Frederik Westin, BWH

Project Description

Objective Approach and Plan Progress and Next Steps
  • Evaluate/validate the density-based registration framework for DWI developed at UCPH (this is a nonrigid model - see the link below for a paper on the global algorithm).
  • Figure out what diffusion data is available (preferably data already evaluated by another registration model).
  • Discuss best ways to validate results (tractography, biomarkers, synthetic data, phantoms, others?). So far we have visually tested inter-subject registrations of HCP data and intra-subject multi-shell, and intra-subject on young brain tumor subjects.
  • Consider if Slicer can be used in tandem for evaluation.
  • This method introduces Mutual Information to nonrigid registration of DWI. Discuss if other similarity measures (e.g. correlation measures) would be better suited for specific problems.

Background and References