Difference between revisions of "2017 Winter Project Week/LORDWI"
From NAMIC Wiki
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| | | | ||
<!-- Objective bullet points --> | <!-- Objective bullet points --> | ||
− | * Objective: Evaluate/validate a density-based non-rigid registration framework for DWI (see the link below for a paper on similarity measure used). | + | * '''Objective''': Evaluate/validate a density-based non-rigid registration framework for DWI (see the link below for a paper on similarity measure used). <br>''In short: Is this a good registration?'' |
− | * Short description: The model is based on Free-Form Deformation B-splines where the directions are updated using the normalized Jacobian. B-spline interpolation is used spatially, the Watson Distribution is used directionally. Histogram is | + | * '''Short description''': The model is based on Free-Form Deformation B-splines where the directions are updated using the normalized Jacobian. B-spline interpolation is used spatially, the Watson Distribution is used directionally. Histogram is smoothed. Similarity is NMI and optimisation is L-BFGS. |
| | | | ||
<!-- Approach and Plan bullet points --> | <!-- Approach and Plan bullet points --> | ||
− | + | * Discuss best ways to validate results (tractography, biomarkers, synthetic data, phantoms, others?). So far we have visually tested inter-subject registrations of HCP data, intra-subject multi-shell, and intra-subject on child brain tumor subjects. | |
− | * Discuss best ways to validate results (tractography, biomarkers, synthetic data, phantoms, others?). So far we have visually tested inter-subject registrations of HCP data | + | * Figure out anyone is in need of DWI registration for testing, have a dataset already registered (for comparison), or can help with anatomical landmarks. |
* Consider if Slicer can be used in tandem for evaluation. | * Consider if Slicer can be used in tandem for evaluation. | ||
* This method introduces Mutual Information to nonrigid registration of DWI. Discuss if other similarity measures (e.g. correlation measures) would be better suited for specific problems. | * This method introduces Mutual Information to nonrigid registration of DWI. Discuss if other similarity measures (e.g. correlation measures) would be better suited for specific problems. |
Revision as of 00:33, 9 January 2017
Home < 2017 Winter Project Week < LORDWIKey Investigators
- Henrik Groenholt Jensen, UCPH
- Lauren J. O'Donnell, BWH
- Tina Kapur, BWH
- Fan Zhang, BWH
- Carl-Fredrik Westin, BWH
Project Description
Objective | Approach and Plan | Progress and Next Steps |
---|---|---|
|
|
|
Background and References
- MICCAI paper on early framework: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-24571-3_37