Difference between revisions of "2017 Winter Project Week/UpdatingCommunityForums"
Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
* [high] Get email notification about specific themes (releases, announcements, sub-community, such as shape analysis, RT, ...) | * [high] Get email notification about specific themes (releases, announcements, sub-community, such as shape analysis, RT, ...) | ||
* [high] Import existing users | * [high] Import existing users | ||
+ | * [high] Code highlight | ||
* [medium] Authentication with github | * [medium] Authentication with github | ||
* [medium] Option for yearly billing | * [medium] Option for yearly billing | ||
* [medium] Polls (vote on features to be developed, collect community feedback for decisions, etc) | * [medium] Polls (vote on features to be developed, collect community feedback for decisions, etc) | ||
+ | * [medium] Permalinks of thread for easy sharing by email | ||
* [low] Answer posts through email | * [low] Answer posts through email | ||
* [low] Vote for good answers, mark accepted answer | * [low] Vote for good answers, mark accepted answer | ||
+ | * [low] Support cross referencing of Github issues |
Revision as of 20:00, 11 January 2017
Home < 2017 Winter Project Week < UpdatingCommunityForumsKey Investigators
- Andrey Fedorov
- Andras Lasso
- Mike Halle
- Steve Pieper
- Isaiah Norton
- Tina Kapur
- Teodora Szasz
- The COMMUNITY
Project Description
Objective | Approach and Plan | Progress and Next Steps |
---|---|---|
|
|
|
Decision-making policy draft
1. Given the topic of interest, initiate discussion on the mailing list
2. Identify a small circle of community members that are interested to study the topic in more depth
3. Take the discussion off the general list, work on the analysis of options and alternatives, summarize findings on the wiki or similar
4. Announce the in-depth discussion of the topic for the Slicer Community hangout, encourage anyone that is interested in weighing in on the topic to join the discussion. If there is someone who is interested to participate in the discussion, but cannot join the meeting due to conflict, they should notify the leaders of the given project and identify the time suitable for everyone. (Note: we might want to advertise Slicer Hangout appropriately, include agenda in the announcement email directly, and advertise the event to Slicer users as well as developers)
5. Hopefully, reach consensus at the hangout and proceed with the agreed plan.
Background and References
- Discourse discussion / proposal on the Slicer mailing list
- Discussions of GitHub hosting:
- Discourse and Slack (or other group chat apps like IRC, HipChat, Gitter, etc)
- https://www.slicer.org/wiki/Documentation/Labs/DocumentationImprovments
- NodeBB - like Discourse https://nodebb.org/pricing
- https://experts.feverbee.com/t/discourse-vs-nodebb/1384/6
- Comparison of forum software: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Internet_forum_software
Requirements
- [high] Get email notification about specific themes (releases, announcements, sub-community, such as shape analysis, RT, ...)
- [high] Import existing users
- [high] Code highlight
- [medium] Authentication with github
- [medium] Option for yearly billing
- [medium] Polls (vote on features to be developed, collect community feedback for decisions, etc)
- [medium] Permalinks of thread for easy sharing by email
- [low] Answer posts through email
- [low] Vote for good answers, mark accepted answer
- [low] Support cross referencing of Github issues