Difference between revisions of "2017 Winter Project Week/Integrative Intraoperative Interface"

From NAMIC Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 33: Line 33:
 
|
 
|
 
<!-- Progress and Next steps bullet points (fill out at the end of project week) -->
 
<!-- Progress and Next steps bullet points (fill out at the end of project week) -->
−
*
+
* decision for further exploration of 3DSlicer as tool for image control in neurosurgery
 +
* pre-analysis and evaluation of intraoperative image setup and control
 +
** identification of primary (PACS) and optional (non-PACS) image sources by type of case
 +
** testing freedom of dynamic interaction with and manipulation of customized imaging display (number, size and arrangement of windowed content)
 +
* start scenario: remote image control by dedicated person (delegation)
 +
* future scenario: direct control by surgeon (e.g. via sterile touch screen)
 
|}
 
|}

Revision as of 18:35, 12 January 2017

Home < 2017 Winter Project Week < Integrative Intraoperative Interface


Key Investigators

  • Anna Roethe (Humboldt University and Charité University Hospital Berlin)
  • Rebekka Lauer (Humboldt University Berlin)
  • Prashin Unadkat (Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston)
  • Sarah Frisken (Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston)


Project Description

The project aims to discuss the concept of integrative OR environments from a holistic neurosurgical design perspective. Open questions to be addressed include qualitative standardization of information visualization for intraoperative use, integration of PACS and non-PACS imaging data sets, and ready-to-use image control setup operated by surgeons and staff. During project week, the main focus will be on more elaborate use of already existing technology (e.g. multi-window mode of 3D Slicer).

Objective Approach and Plan Progress and Next Steps
  • create, discuss and refine design concept of surgical (touch) interface for intraoperative multimodal and multi-source image control
  • define relevant image data sources for standard and research procedures
  • discuss and define standard display settings, potentially including automation of basic aspects
  • prepare implementation of direct interaction in the OR
  • decision for further exploration of 3DSlicer as tool for image control in neurosurgery
  • pre-analysis and evaluation of intraoperative image setup and control
    • identification of primary (PACS) and optional (non-PACS) image sources by type of case
    • testing freedom of dynamic interaction with and manipulation of customized imaging display (number, size and arrangement of windowed content)
  • start scenario: remote image control by dedicated person (delegation)
  • future scenario: direct control by surgeon (e.g. via sterile touch screen)
Retrieved from "https://www.na-mic.org/w/index.php?title=2017_Winter_Project_Week/Integrative_Intraoperative_Interface&oldid=94865"