Difference between revisions of "2008 Winter Project Week Tractography Meeting Notes"
From NAMIC Wiki
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | |||
= Notes from Presentations and Discussions = | = Notes from Presentations and Discussions = | ||
== Data quality, NAMIC DTI pipeline == | == Data quality, NAMIC DTI pipeline == | ||
* Issues? | * Issues? | ||
+ | * White matter mask? | ||
== ROI definitions and impact on different methods == | == ROI definitions and impact on different methods == | ||
* Force all methods to use the same ROIs? | * Force all methods to use the same ROIs? | ||
− | + | * For streamline methods larger ROIs than the tract itself good | |
Methods: | Methods: |
Revision as of 17:20, 9 January 2008
Home < 2008 Winter Project Week Tractography Meeting NotesContents
Notes from Presentations and Discussions
Data quality, NAMIC DTI pipeline
- Issues?
- White matter mask?
ROI definitions and impact on different methods
- Force all methods to use the same ROIs?
- For streamline methods larger ROIs than the tract itself good
Methods:
- Streamline Slicer2 (Sonia)
- Streamline Fiberviewer (Casey)
- Stochastic Slicer3 (Tri)
- Shortest path, volumetric (John)
- Shortest path, volumetric (Tom)
Review and define metrics to compare results, which methods to compare?
Current metrics: tensor invariants (FA, trace, mode, norm), volume, length.
- 12 different tracts
- Tracts voxelized -> volumetric result from tracts
- Missing parts of a tract, how should be penalized?
- Statistics along the tracts, should we sum along the tract to get one measure?
- Distributions across the tract
- Atlas (Casey)