Difference between revisions of "CTSC:ARRA.061510"
From NAMIC Wiki
| Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
** Cynthia will develop drawings | ** Cynthia will develop drawings | ||
** Wendy will clarify concepts and workflow. | ** Wendy will clarify concepts and workflow. | ||
| + | ** Two possible entry points: | ||
| + | *** already in i2b2 world. Here, you get a dataMart consisting only of patients you are permitted to see. Never constrained by study. | ||
| + | *** user is "on his honor" can get any MRN that he pleases. Can be provided with a list of many, many patients. (user knows that this transaction will be audited). | ||
| + | *** Note: at Partner's, user group is educated, certified, etc. Understand the issues. Can't rely upon this however -- other sites may differ. | ||
Revision as of 15:20, 15 June 2010
Home < CTSC:ARRA.061510Back to CTSC:ARRA supplement
Agenda
- mi2b2 installation update
- preparation for advisory board meeting.
- mi2b2 UI & UXP
Harvard Catalyst Medical Informatics group Meeting Minutes June 8, 2010
In attendance:
- Shawn Murphy
- Bill Wang
- Cynthia Lee
- Steve Pieper
- Yong Gao
- Chris Herrick
- Wendy Plesniak
- Darren Sack
- Charles McGow
- Valerie Humblet
- Jesse Wei
- Mark Anderson (by phone)
- Carl (by phone)
Meeting Minutes
- mi2b2 STAR-D site installation update:
- Progress: able to retrieve image to middle layer using cmove, upload to file repository -
- next phase: taking user interface design and working logic into that new design.
- talked with Mike Darcy at USC about what they're doing. They are using dcm4chee as a caching mechanism -- problem is that there is no delete command for dcm4chee... (but this exists on the console, so Steve, Chris feel this functionality must be there somewhere?)
- Discuss another tool called "PixelMed"
- Steve also describes dcmtk.
- (Sketchy notes while I was getting network set up -- can Chris update these with more detail?)
- advisory board meeting preparation
- want to present where we are with each site
- how close are we to being able to deliver
- what are our plans for the next six months.
- Shawn wants to be able to say we are only moving test images for the next six months during testing.
- These are real patients, all modalities, move things over to XNAT.
- We will not be supporting an actual study at this point -- just in testing phase.
- Collaborations with WashU: XNAT people are off preparing their example for how to receive images from mi2b2 STAR-D using webservices.
- Their example will tell us how to describe image data of interest using an xml wrapper
- log in and be authenticated.
- upload it using webservices API (this should be pretty close.
- send our team the play-by-play 'how-to' documentation.
- How will mi2b2 and XNAT coordinate authentication?
- STAR-D has images. May want to send them to Project A, Project B, or Project C on XNAT.
- STAR-D has an administrative password for XNAT. It will use that admin password to comm with XNAT.
- STAR-D will request a sessionID giving user name and password: XNAT will give access to any project with compatible permissions.
- Keeping an Audit Trail: Should we generate an audit trail that lists
- who accessed,
- what data was retreived and
- and where it went?
- No UI issues yet for the advisory board.
- UI design and concepts
- Win Song developing UI software
- Cynthia will develop drawings
- Wendy will clarify concepts and workflow.
- Two possible entry points:
- already in i2b2 world. Here, you get a dataMart consisting only of patients you are permitted to see. Never constrained by study.
- user is "on his honor" can get any MRN that he pleases. Can be provided with a list of many, many patients. (user knows that this transaction will be audited).
- Note: at Partner's, user group is educated, certified, etc. Understand the issues. Can't rely upon this however -- other sites may differ.
