Difference between revisions of "2012 Winter Project Week:TBIValidation"
From NAMIC Wiki
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
<h3>Objective</h3> | <h3>Objective</h3> | ||
* Defining manual segmentation protocol for MR images of TBI | * Defining manual segmentation protocol for MR images of TBI | ||
| − | * Comparing the independent segmentation and joint segmentation | + | * Comparing the independent segmentation and joint segmentation |
* Visualizing volume changes, deformation field | * Visualizing volume changes, deformation field | ||
Revision as of 13:23, 13 January 2012
Home < 2012 Winter Project Week:TBIValidation
- Visualization and validation of segmentation
Visualization of the deformation field via determinant of Jacobian
Visualization of the deformation field via vector magnitude
Manual segmentation - ground truth
Result of the segmentation algorithm
Key Investigators
- Utah: Bo Wang, Marcel Prastawa, and Guido Gerig
- UCLA: Andrei Irimia, Micah Chambers, Jack Van Horn and Paul M. Vespa
- Kitware: Danielle Pace, Stephen Aylward
Objective
- Defining manual segmentation protocol for MR images of TBI
- Comparing the independent segmentation and joint segmentation
- Visualizing volume changes, deformation field
Approach, Plan
Our plan for the project week:
- Working with collaborators to define manual segmentation protocol
- Visualizing volume changes and deformation field according to clinicians' requirements.
Progress
To be added.
References
- Bo Wang, Marcel Prastawa, Andrei Irimia, Micah C. Chambers, Paul M. Vespa, John D. van Horn, Guido Gerig, A Patient-Specific Segmentation Framework for Longitudinal MR Images of Traumatic Brain Injury, SPIE Medical Imaging 2012.
- Andrei Irimia, Micah C. Chambers, Jeffry R. Alger, Maria Filippou, Marcel W. Prastawa, Bo Wang, David A. Hovda, Guido Gerig, Arthur W. Toga, Ron Kikinis, Paul M. Vespa, John D. van Horn (2011) Comparison of acute and chronic traumatic brain injury using semi-automatic multimodal segmentation of MR volumes. Journal of Neurotrauma
