Difference between revisions of "2012 Summer Project Week:VecReg"
From NAMIC Wiki
(Created page with '__NOTOC__ <gallery> Image:PW-MIT2012.png|Projects List Image:CARMA_VecReg_Check1-2.png|Current Registration Example - needs some work Image:…') |
|||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
We have generated some initial registration examples [http://wiki.na-mic.org/Wiki/index.php/DBP3:Utah:VecReg]. We need to improve the spatial accuracy of the current methods. | We have generated some initial registration examples [http://wiki.na-mic.org/Wiki/index.php/DBP3:Utah:VecReg]. We need to improve the spatial accuracy of the current methods. | ||
+ | During this week: | ||
+ | * We have followed the extension submission guideline and submit the extension to the extension manager. Hopefully it will appear in nightly soon. | ||
+ | * We have discussed and set the goal for next step to improve the registration performance, as well as possible ways to achieve that. | ||
</div> | </div> |
Latest revision as of 22:21, 21 June 2012
Home < 2012 Summer Project Week:VecRegKey Investigators
- BWH: Yi Gao, Sylvain Bouix
- Utah: Danny Perry, Alan Morris, Josh Cates, Greg Gardner, Rob MacLeod
- BU: Allen Tannenbaum
- GaTech: Liang-Jia Zhu
Objective
We are developing a vector-valued registration module capable of registering pre- and post-ablation images, using the information from the MRI images and corresponding segmentations. The goal is to improve the accuracy of the current registration methods.
Approach, Plan
Our approach is to use the information in the LGE-MRI images and the blood pool segmentations to drive the registration.
Our plan for the project week is to evaluate the existing method and develop an approach to improve the current accuracy.
Progress
We have generated some initial registration examples [1]. We need to improve the spatial accuracy of the current methods.
During this week:
- We have followed the extension submission guideline and submit the extension to the extension manager. Hopefully it will appear in nightly soon.
- We have discussed and set the goal for next step to improve the registration performance, as well as possible ways to achieve that.
Delivery Mechanism
This work will be delivered to the NA-MIC Kit as a
- ITK Module - NO
- Slicer Module
- Built-in - NO
- Extension -- commandline - YES
- Extension -- loadable - NO
- Other (Please specify)