Difference between revisions of "4D DTI tractography in Slicer for TBI"

From NAMIC Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 30: Line 30:
 
<h3>Progress</h3>
 
<h3>Progress</h3>
  
* using Slicer registration modules to do coregistration.
+
* using Slicer registration modules to do coregistration between structural and diffusion MRI.
 
** tried affine, Bspline, demons registration modules.
 
** tried affine, Bspline, demons registration modules.
 
* worked with Andrei and Anuja together to solve the problem of loading DICOM images.
 
* worked with Andrei and Anuja together to solve the problem of loading DICOM images.
* discussed with Andrei and Micah about recent progress.
+
* discussed with Andrei and Micah about recent progress and future plan.
 
* attended the TBI DBP Team Meeting.
 
* attended the TBI DBP Team Meeting.
 +
  
  
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>

Revision as of 09:22, 11 January 2013

Home < 4D DTI tractography in Slicer for TBI

Key Investigators

Bo Wang, Andrei Irimia, Micah Chambers, Jack Van Horn, Marcel Prastawa, Guido Gerig

Objective

  • Combining structural and DTI information for assessment of recovery and treatment efficacy for TBI.
  • Coregistration of structural and DTI data of TBI.
  • Applying 4D model to DTI data to investigate the changes between acute and chronic time points.


Approach, Plan

  • Register DTI to structural images.
  • Apply deformation between acute and chronic time points to the co-registered DTI images
  • Evaluate initial result with our collaborators

Progress

  • using Slicer registration modules to do coregistration between structural and diffusion MRI.
    • tried affine, Bspline, demons registration modules.
  • worked with Andrei and Anuja together to solve the problem of loading DICOM images.
  • discussed with Andrei and Micah about recent progress and future plan.
  • attended the TBI DBP Team Meeting.