Difference between revisions of "4D DTI tractography in Slicer for TBI"
From NAMIC Wiki
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
<h3>Progress</h3> | <h3>Progress</h3> | ||
− | * using Slicer registration modules to do coregistration. | + | * using Slicer registration modules to do coregistration between structural and diffusion MRI. |
** tried affine, Bspline, demons registration modules. | ** tried affine, Bspline, demons registration modules. | ||
* worked with Andrei and Anuja together to solve the problem of loading DICOM images. | * worked with Andrei and Anuja together to solve the problem of loading DICOM images. | ||
− | * discussed with Andrei and Micah about recent progress. | + | * discussed with Andrei and Micah about recent progress and future plan. |
* attended the TBI DBP Team Meeting. | * attended the TBI DBP Team Meeting. | ||
+ | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> |
Revision as of 09:22, 11 January 2013
Home < 4D DTI tractography in Slicer for TBIKey Investigators
Bo Wang, Andrei Irimia, Micah Chambers, Jack Van Horn, Marcel Prastawa, Guido Gerig
Objective
- Combining structural and DTI information for assessment of recovery and treatment efficacy for TBI.
- Coregistration of structural and DTI data of TBI.
- Applying 4D model to DTI data to investigate the changes between acute and chronic time points.
Approach, Plan
- Register DTI to structural images.
- Apply deformation between acute and chronic time points to the co-registered DTI images
- Evaluate initial result with our collaborators
Progress
- using Slicer registration modules to do coregistration between structural and diffusion MRI.
- tried affine, Bspline, demons registration modules.
- worked with Andrei and Anuja together to solve the problem of loading DICOM images.
- discussed with Andrei and Micah about recent progress and future plan.
- attended the TBI DBP Team Meeting.