Difference between revisions of "Validation and testing of 3D Slicer modules implementing the Utah segmentation algorithm for traumatic brain injury"
From NAMIC Wiki
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
<h3>Approach, Plan</h3> | <h3>Approach, Plan</h3> | ||
− | + | * Bo and Marcel will be working together on the C++ implementation. | |
+ | * Discuss with our collaborators from UCLA about their requirements. | ||
+ | * Test and debug the preliminary code. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 38: | Line 40: | ||
* Slicer module | * Slicer module | ||
+ | ** Standalone module for the first step | ||
==References== | ==References== |
Revision as of 03:12, 17 June 2013
Home < Validation and testing of 3D Slicer modules implementing the Utah segmentation algorithm for traumatic brain injuryKey Investigators
- Utah: Bo Wang, Marcel Prastawa, Guido Gerig
- UCLA: Andrei Irimia, Micah Chambers, Jack Van Horn
Objective
- The primary objective is for the Utah team to coordinate with UCLA regarding the release of a Slicer module to perform multimodal automatic segmentation of TBI using the methodologies developed by the Utah team.
- One planned topic of interest includes a progress update to the UCLA group on the current status of the matlab/C++/VTK translation of the Utah algorithm
- We intend to spend some time on testing the method as well as on getting feedback on the best way to integrate the algorithm within Slicer
- It would also be useful to demonstrate how the algorithm performs on the UCLA data which have already been made available to the Utah team
Approach, Plan
- Bo and Marcel will be working together on the C++ implementation.
- Discuss with our collaborators from UCLA about their requirements.
- Test and debug the preliminary code.
Progress
Delivery Mechanism
- Slicer module
- Standalone module for the first step