Difference between revisions of "2013 Summer Project Week:Deformable transforms"
From NAMIC Wiki
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
<h3>Progress</h3> | <h3>Progress</h3> | ||
− | + | * Should it be handled | |
− | + | ** on the MRML level (Transformable, VolumesLogic?) | |
− | + | ** '''or in a CLI (BRAINSResample, Resample Scalar/Vector/DWI Volume)''' - Subject Hierarchy would know what module can transform what objects using what transforms and use them | |
− | ** | + | * Invertability / reversibility |
− | + | ** '''Should it create clones of the 'hardened' objects?''' - in Subject Hierarchy | |
− | ** | + | ** Should we maintain a history in the hardened nodes? |
− | + | ** '''Harden option on drop (I can't display but can resample)''' - in Data and Transforms modules | |
− | + | * Plugin mechanism for registering non-linear transforms | |
− | + | ** Modules register themselves in the fashion "I can apply X type of transform to Y type objects" | |
− | + | *** The application could call these algorithms (instead of registering from outside) | |
− | + | ** GUI decision if hardened | |
− | + | * Where? | |
− | + | ** Data module | |
− | ** Harden all the way up or until all the parents are linear or just one level a time? | + | ** Transforms module (display tree, and add a 'Harden' button to the panels) |
− | + | ** Subject Hierarchy right-click -> apply transform to branch | |
− | + | * Harden all the way up or until all the parents are linear or just one level a time? | |
* Extend to contain bounding box | * Extend to contain bounding box | ||
** In case of non-linear transforms, go down the edges to specify the output bounding box | ** In case of non-linear transforms, go down the edges to specify the output bounding box | ||
** Options: resample in source lattice (still cloned), the one above, rsample in target volume | ** Options: resample in source lattice (still cloned), the one above, rsample in target volume | ||
+ | Ideas | ||
* Look at the DICOM transform logic | * Look at the DICOM transform logic | ||
** Make frame of reference concept explicit in Slicer? | ** Make frame of reference concept explicit in Slicer? | ||
− | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> |
Revision as of 21:08, 17 June 2013
Home < 2013 Summer Project Week:Deformable transformsKey Investigators
- Queen's: Csaba Pinter, Andras Lasso
- Isomics: Alex Yarmarkovich, Steve Pieper
- GE Research: Jim Miller
Objective
Enable handling of deformable transforms in the Transforms module, very similarly to the way linear transforms are handled.
- Drop TransformableNodes under deformable transform (possible already but ignored and hardening for rendering not enabled)
- Harden deformable transform on
- Models (should be straightforward)
- Volumes (confirmation popup window, resampling on choosing yes)
Approach, Plan
The approach is to enhance the Transform node (and Transforms module) to be able to use deformable transform nodes as parents to transformable objects and harden them
The plan for the project week is to discuss the best way to implement it, and start the implementation.
Progress
- Should it be handled
- on the MRML level (Transformable, VolumesLogic?)
- or in a CLI (BRAINSResample, Resample Scalar/Vector/DWI Volume) - Subject Hierarchy would know what module can transform what objects using what transforms and use them
- Invertability / reversibility
- Should it create clones of the 'hardened' objects? - in Subject Hierarchy
- Should we maintain a history in the hardened nodes?
- Harden option on drop (I can't display but can resample) - in Data and Transforms modules
- Plugin mechanism for registering non-linear transforms
- Modules register themselves in the fashion "I can apply X type of transform to Y type objects"
- The application could call these algorithms (instead of registering from outside)
- GUI decision if hardened
- Modules register themselves in the fashion "I can apply X type of transform to Y type objects"
- Where?
- Data module
- Transforms module (display tree, and add a 'Harden' button to the panels)
- Subject Hierarchy right-click -> apply transform to branch
- Harden all the way up or until all the parents are linear or just one level a time?
- Extend to contain bounding box
- In case of non-linear transforms, go down the edges to specify the output bounding box
- Options: resample in source lattice (still cloned), the one above, rsample in target volume
Ideas
- Look at the DICOM transform logic
- Make frame of reference concept explicit in Slicer?
Delivery Mechanism
This work will be delivered to the NA-MIC Kit as an enhancement in Slicer core.
References
- Relevant tickets in the SlicerRT system: #247 and #37
- Transforms module documentation