Difference between revisions of "2014 Project Week:Shape Registration and Regression"
From NAMIC Wiki
Jfishbaugh (talk | contribs) (Created page with '__NOTOC__ <gallery> Image:PW-SLC2014.png|Projects List </gallery> ==Key Investigators== * Utah: James Fishbaugh, Guido Gerig * Iowa: Hans J…') |
Jfishbaugh (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
<div style="width: 27%; float: left; padding-right: 3%;"> | <div style="width: 27%; float: left; padding-right: 3%;"> | ||
<h3>Objective</h3> | <h3>Objective</h3> | ||
+ | Integrate shape matching and shape regression tools into Slicer as command line applications. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div style="width: 27%; float: left; padding-right: 3%;"> | <div style="width: 27%; float: left; padding-right: 3%;"> | ||
<h3>Approach, Plan</h3> | <h3>Approach, Plan</h3> | ||
− | * | + | The first step is to integrate shape matching/registration into Slicer as a command line application. Some key issues to resolve: |
+ | * What input parameters should be made available to user. | ||
+ | * Input/Output format: Paths to data or Slicer Models? | ||
+ | * Output is a time series of surfaces, which is not easily explored in Slicer. Should output be simplified? Output could be the deformed source and/or the deformation field that transforms source to target. | ||
+ | * Dependencies on external libraries and licensing issues | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div style="width: 27%; float: left; padding-right: 3%;"> | <div style="width: 27%; float: left; padding-right: 3%;"> |
Revision as of 18:42, 6 January 2014
Home < 2014 Project Week:Shape Registration and RegressionKey Investigators
- Utah: James Fishbaugh, Guido Gerig
- Iowa: Hans Johnson
Project Description
Objective
Integrate shape matching and shape regression tools into Slicer as command line applications.
Approach, Plan
The first step is to integrate shape matching/registration into Slicer as a command line application. Some key issues to resolve:
- What input parameters should be made available to user.
- Input/Output format: Paths to data or Slicer Models?
- Output is a time series of surfaces, which is not easily explored in Slicer. Should output be simplified? Output could be the deformed source and/or the deformation field that transforms source to target.
- Dependencies on external libraries and licensing issues