Difference between revisions of "ProstateNavigation workflow"
From NAMIC Wiki
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
* Evaluate the segmentation results (DICE-Coefficient) by comparing to manual segmentation of trained radiologists using [http://www.spl.harvard.edu/publications/item/view/2174 this] dataset | * Evaluate the segmentation results (DICE-Coefficient) by comparing to manual segmentation of trained radiologists using [http://www.spl.harvard.edu/publications/item/view/2174 this] dataset | ||
* Evaluate pre-op to intra-op registration with General Registration (BRAINS) module in Slicer 4.4 using Landmark Registration Error | * Evaluate pre-op to intra-op registration with General Registration (BRAINS) module in Slicer 4.4 using Landmark Registration Error | ||
| − | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div style="width: 27%; float: left; padding-right: 3%;"> | <div style="width: 27%; float: left; padding-right: 3%;"> | ||
Revision as of 20:30, 5 January 2015
Home < ProstateNavigation workflow
Key Investigators
Peter Behringer and Andrey Fedorov
Project Description
Objective
- Design an easy to use GUI for ProstateNavigation (Planning, Registration, Navigation)
- Get Ideas how prostate segmentation can be done quicker, fully automatic in best case
- Validate different pre-op to intra-op registration approaches
Approach, Plan
- Create mockup GUI
- Try to use existing segmentation modules like Robust Statistics Segmenter or VolumeClip for quicker prostate segmentation
- Evaluate the segmentation results (DICE-Coefficient) by comparing to manual segmentation of trained radiologists using this dataset
- Evaluate pre-op to intra-op registration with General Registration (BRAINS) module in Slicer 4.4 using Landmark Registration Error
Progress
- We created a manual describing the workflow steps in the current stage
- Created requirements list containing the core functions of the workflow
